Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court refused the Charity Commission’s judicial review challenge to an Ombudsman decision, holding the claim academic and, in any event, unarguable.
The High Court held that a judicial review of an ICGS investigation into an MP was barred by Parliamentary privilege and not justiciable.
The appeal was refused because the Divisional Court's findings of fact—that the Secretary of State did not purport to apply the SELC to the F-35 Carve Out and that the SELC was expressly disapplied—were unassailable. Without a domestic foothold, the court could not interpret or apply the international obligations relied upon. Customary international law obligations cited by the applicant were not received into the common law due to lack of widespread state practice and constitutional constraints. The process by which the decision was made was rational and thorough. There was no compelling rea…
Source excerpt
Font v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2025] EWHC 3057 (Admin) (19 November 2025)
Permission for judicial review was refused in a challenge to HMRC’s MAP correspondence on UK-Spain treaty residence under a double taxation agreement.
The High Court refused permission for judicial review of HMRC’s MAP letter on UK-Spain treaty residence, holding it was an intermediate step with no legal effect.
Al-Haq, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade [2025] EWCA Civ 1433 (12 November 2025)
The Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in Al-Haq’s challenge to the F-35 carve-out from the UK’s suspension of certain export licences to Israel.
Campbell, R (On the Application Of) v His Majesty's Attorney General for England and Wales [2025] EWHC 1653 (Admin) (01 July 2025)
The High Court held that the Attorney General’s refusal of authority under s. 13(1)(b) of the Coroners Act 1988 was not justiciable and refused permission for judicial review.
Al-Haq, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade [2025] EWHC 173 (Admin) (30 January 2025)
The Administrative Court refused permission to amend challenging superseded export-licensing decisions, but allowed amended grounds on the F-35 carve-out to proceed at a rolled-up hearing.
On current authority, the Attorney General's refusal of authority under s.13(1)(b) of the Coroners Act 1988 is not justiciable. If justiciable, review is limited to fraud, bad faith, or exceptional circumstances, none of which are pleaded here.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to the Government’s decision not to commence section 192 ERA 1996 immediately, holding the decision was lawful and within a wide discretion.
Explore more
