Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Presbar Diecastings Ltd v GW Atkins & Sons Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 399 (Ch) (25 February 2026)
High Court Chancery Division judgment on an APA dispute: Presbar recovered the unpaid purchase price, while Shield’s principal order book and machinery warranty counterclaims mostly failed.
Commercial Court held that Onex was not liable for an Iraqi SRFO cargo containing 16ppm organic chlorides; the contract’s “typicals” were not binding warranties.
Mercuria Energy Trading SA v Onex DMCC [2026] EWHC 130 (Comm) (22 January 2026)
Commercial Court held that an Organic Chloride entry was a non-binding typical, not a guarantee, and dismissed Mercuria’s claim over a contaminated fuel oil cargo.
Skyros Maritime Corporation & Anor v Hapag-Lloyd AG (Re 'SKYROS' & 'AGIOS MINAS') [2025] EWCA Civ 1529 (28 November 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that shipowners can recover ordinary late-redelivery damages by reference to market and contract rates, even if a sale meant no re-chartering would follow.
The Court of Appeal held that owners could recover substantial damages for late redelivery of time-chartered vessels, measured by market rate over the overrun period.
The Privy Council held CS Life owed a contractual investment duty, but adjusted damages start dates and dismissed the cross-appeal on misrepresentation.
Mallas v Persimmon Homes Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 2581 (TCC) (09 October 2025)
The High Court held that inadequate foundations breached contract and the Defective Premises Act, but demolition of the house was unnecessary; damages were assessed on underpinning and repair.
Wilson & Ors v HB (SWA) Ltd [2025] EWHC 1315 (TCC) (30 May 2025)
The court struck out most of the Wilsons’ claimed loss heads in a defective premises and lease breach case, allowing only service charge and interest claims to continue.
Southern Electricity Power Distribution PLC v OCU Modus Ltd [2025] EWHC 723 (TCC) (27 March 2025)
The High Court held that defective cable installation work justified full circuit replacement, and that SEPD’s chosen remedial scheme and costs were reasonable and recoverable.
The court held that full replacement of two defective underground cable circuits was a reasonable remedial response, and awarded SEPD ÂŁ2,642,237.71.
Explore more
