R v Neil Webb Johnson
There was no sufficient evidential foundation before the judge to establish the necessity for a restraining order post-acquittal, as required by law. The judge erred in making the order without evidence of a significant future risk of harassment, particularly given the long passage of time since the last alleged conduct and absence of recent complaints or statements supporting necessity.
Source excerpt
- Restraining orders
- Acquittal
- Protection from harassment
- Necessity test
- Appeals