Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Insolvency

Manolete Partners Plc v David Smith

The High Court held that payments by A & D Joinery Limited to its former owner were transactions at an undervalue and a partial breach of duty.

  • Transaction at undervalue
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Section 238 insolvency act 1986
  • Section 171-175 companies act 2006
  • Balance sheet and cashflow insolvency
  • Directors' duties
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2026] EWHC 815 (Ch)

SCIO-Fund SICAV-FIS & Anor v Merchant & Anor

SCIO-Fund SICAV-FIS & Anor v Merchant & Anor [2026] EWHC 815 (Ch) (16 April 2026)

The High Court revoked approval of an IVA after finding material irregularity from undisclosed standstill agreements and inadequate nominee scrutiny.

  • Individual voluntary arrangement (iva)
  • Material irregularity
  • Unfair prejudice
  • Pari passu principle
  • Nominee duties
  • Disclosure obligations
Read case analysis
Insolvency

TAQA Bratani Limited & Ors v Fujairah Oil and Gas UK LLC & Ors

The Court of Appeal held that a dividend, not the wider sale arrangement, was the relevant s.238 transaction; the s.238(5) defence failed and the case was remitted.

  • Transaction at undervalue
  • Pari passu principle
  • Remedy under s.238 insolvency act
  • Corporate distributions
  • Consideration in insolvency context
  • Insolvency
Read case analysis
Insolvency law

Strategic Value Capital Solutions Master Fund LP & Ors v AGPS BondCo PLC

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court erred in sanctioning the restructuring plan because it departed from the pari passu principle by preserving sequential payment dates for different series of notes, thereby imposing greater risk of non-payment on the 2029 Noteholders without justification. The court found that there was no good reason or proper basis for this differential treatment, and that the judge failed to consider whether a fairer plan could have been made. The court also held that overall support for the plan across all classes was not a relevant factor in exercising the cros…

  • Restructuring plans
  • Cross-class cram down
  • Schemes of arrangement
  • Pari passu principle
  • Jurisdiction under part 26a
  • Creditors' rights
Read case analysis
Insolvency

In the matter of AGPS Bondco PLC

The High Court sanctioned AGPS BondCo PLC’s Part 26A restructuring plan, including cross-class cram down of dissenting 2029 noteholders, and upheld the issuer substitution under German law.

  • Restructuring plan
  • Cross-class cram down
  • Jurisdiction
  • Issuer substitution
  • Pari passu principle
  • Majority creditor rights
Read case analysis
Insolvency

Project Verona Limited, Re

The plan is sanctioned because it meets statutory requirements for cross-class cram down, provides a better outcome for dissenting creditors than the relevant alternative (administration), and no unfairness in distribution of restructuring benefits is established. No creditor attended to object, and the court finds no jurisdictional or procedural defects.

  • Cross-class cram down
  • Restructuring plan
  • Sanction of plan
  • Creditor meetings
  • Pari passu principle
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2024] EWCA Civ 24

Strategic Value Capital Solutions Master Fund LP & Ors v AGPS BondCo PLC (Re AGPS BondCo PLC)

Strategic Value Capital Solutions Master Fund LP & Ors v AGPS BondCo PLC (Re AGPS BondCo PLC) [2024] EWCA Civ 24 (23 January 2024)

The Court of Appeal upheld sanction of AGPS Bondco’s Part 26A restructuring plan, rejecting challenges to cross-class cram down, pari passu treatment, and valuation.

  • Restructuring plan
  • Cross-class cram down
  • Companies act 2006 part 26a
  • Pari passu principle
  • Sanction discretion
  • Restructuring-plan
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2023] EWCA Civ 1135

Darty Holdings SAS v Carton-Kelly (As Additional Liquidator of Cgl Realisations Limited)

Darty Holdings SAS v Carton-Kelly (As Additional Liquidator of Cgl Realisations Limited) [2023] EWCA Civ 1135 (09 October 2023)

The Court of Appeal held that Comet’s preference claim failed because the only operative decision to repay intra-group debt was made by the board on 3 February 2012.

  • Preference
  • Section 239 insolvency act 1986
  • Intra-group debt repayment
  • Corporate decision-making
  • Pari passu principle
  • Insolvency-preference
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.