Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law

Medway Council v M & Ors (The Children Act 1989, Re)

Care proceedings fact-finding judgment finding neglect, excessive chores, and physical harm by F, but no finding that F viewed child abuse images or that M was sexually gratified.

  • Care proceedings
  • Child neglect
  • Sexual harm
  • Physical harm
  • Threshold criteria
  • Evidence assessment
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] EWFC 378 (B)

North Lincolnshire Council v M1 & Ors

North Lincolnshire Council v M1 & Ors [2025] EWFC 378 (B) (24 October 2025)

The Family Court found that F had subjected P to physical and emotional harm, some controlling and domestic abuse, and approved long-term foster care for P.

  • Care proceedings
  • Fact-finding hearing
  • Domestic abuse
  • Emotional harm
  • Physical harm
  • Sexual abuse allegations
Read case analysis
Family law

A Local Authority v M & Ors

The threshold criteria under s.31(2) Children Act 1989 are satisfied because the father assaulted B by grabbing his neck with excessive force, causing physical harm and emotional harm to both children. The parents subjected the children to emotionally abusive language and behaviour, failed to provide stable housing, and minimised domestic abuse. The contemporaneous accounts of the children, corroborated by medical evidence and reliable witness testimony, outweigh the parents' denials and inconsistent explanations.

  • Threshold criteria
  • Significant harm
  • Domestic abuse
  • Emotional harm
  • Physical harm
  • Children act 1989 s.31
Read case analysis
Family law

Cheshire West and Chester Council v C & Ors

The local authority failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that D sexually abused A due to significant inconsistencies in A's accounts, procedural failings in the investigation, and lack of corroborative evidence. However, threshold for a care order for A was established based on the mother's inability to care and D's admitted physical assault (flicking A in the face in anger).

  • Care orders
  • Threshold criteria
  • Sexual abuse allegations
  • Physical harm
  • Welfare of the child
  • Abe interviews
Read case analysis
Family law

C (A boy), Re

On balance of probabilities, F intentionally caused sexual harm to C by touching his penis, emotionally and psychologically abused C through repeated humiliating and inappropriate behaviour, exposed C to physical harm, and failed to provide safe parenting. C's allegations were consistent, credible, and corroborated by video evidence. Professional investigation was blighted by poor practice but did not undermine core findings.

  • Child arrangements
  • Sexual abuse
  • Emotional abuse
  • Psychological harm
  • Physical harm
  • Welfare planning
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] EWFC 434 (B)

Cheshire West and Chester Council v C & Ors

Cheshire West and Chester Council v C & Ors [2025] EWFC 434 (B) (02 October 2025)

Care proceedings concerning A and B. The court found threshold established for A, but not sexual abuse by D. A remains in residential care; B will transition back to D.

  • Care orders
  • Threshold criteria
  • Physical harm
  • Sexual abuse allegations
  • Parental capacity
  • Child welfare
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] EWFC 302 (B)

A Local Authority v M & Ors

A Local Authority v M & Ors [2025] EWFC 302 (B) (08 August 2025)

The Family Court found threshold met in care proceedings concerning two children, accepting that the father caused physical harm and both parents caused emotional harm.

  • Care orders
  • Threshold criteria
  • Physical harm
  • Emotional harm
  • Domestic abuse
  • Child welfare
Read case analysis
Family law

P & Ors, Re

The court found, on balance of probabilities, that F subjected P and Q to physical and emotional harm, exposed them to inappropriate parenting, substance misuse, and controlling behaviour, but did not sexually abuse P. F's behaviour caused significant distress and harm to P. M1 exposed children to risk via substance misuse and unsafe contacts. M2 was subjected to domestic abuse and controlling behaviour by F. The threshold for care orders was met. P's welfare required placement in long-term foster care with indirect contact only.

  • Care orders
  • Domestic abuse
  • Child neglect
  • Physical harm
  • Sexualised behaviour
  • Substance misuse
Read case analysis
Family law

E and H (Care Orders), Re

The threshold for intervention under s.31(2) Children Act 1989 is met: both children have suffered and are at risk of significant harm due to parental failures in health management, emotional availability, and neglect. Despite extensive support, neither parent can provide good enough care, and no lesser order would suffice. Removal to foster care is necessary and proportionate to safeguard the children's welfare, outweighing their wishes to remain with their mother.

  • Care orders
  • Parental responsibility
  • Child welfare
  • Neglect
  • Physical harm
  • Emotional harm
Read case analysis
Family law [2024] EWFC 7 (B)

O & Y, Re (Parents with Learning Disability: Intermediaries)

O & Y, Re (Parents with Learning Disability: Intermediaries) [2024] EWFC 7 (B) (26 January 2024)

Family Court care proceedings concerning two children and parents with learning disabilities. Care orders were made, with long-term foster care in separate placements.

  • Care orders
  • Parental learning disability
  • Threshold criteria
  • Welfare principle
  • Domestic abuse
  • Neglect
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.