Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a challenge to planning permission for a sustainable urban extension at Mudford, holding that Policy YV2 did not require immediate construction of all non-residential elements.
Permission for judicial review of a planning permission grant was refused. The court found none of five grounds arguable, including consultation, conditions, EIA screening and flood risk.
Friends of Gillingham (Norfolk) Countryside Community Interest Company, R (On the Application Of) v South Norfolk District Council [2026] EWHC 777 (Admin) (31 March 2026)
The High Court refused permission for judicial review of a planning permission, rejecting challenges about footpath access, consultation, sequential assessments, wastewater conditions, and EIA screening.
The High Court dismissed Wiltshire Council’s section 288 challenge to a planning inspector’s grant of permission for Old Sarum Airfield after a later fire damaged Hangar 3.
Statutory review of a planning decision requiring a water-neutrality condition for 280 homes at Kilnwood Vale was dismissed.
Singhal UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities & Anor [2025] EWHC 1967 (Admin) (01 August 2025)
The High Court allowed Singhal UK Ltd’s challenge in part, finding procedural unfairness when a condition removing permitted development rights was imposed without giving submissions.
The inspector acted with procedural unfairness by imposing a condition removing permitted development rights without giving the parties an opportunity to address its appropriateness, which substantially prejudiced the claimant.
Source excerpt
Works to protected trees were not authorised under Regulation 14(a)(vii) because necessary planning conditions, specifically approval of tree retention plans under condition 34 (and allied conditions), had not been satisfied prior to felling; only trees whose removal is necessarily required by approved plans and conditions may be felled without express consent.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a renewed application for statutory review of a planning inspector’s decision, rejecting challenges to policy interpretation, a planning condition, and hardship balancing.
Dorchester Living Ltd v Secretary of State for Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Ors [2024] EWHC 3284 (Admin) (19 September 2024)
Fordham J refused permission for statutory review, holding there was no arguable legal error in the inspector’s treatment of policy PV5, the Pye condition, or policy BSC1.
Explore more
