Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal set aside a case-management order for a preliminary trial on settlement and unconscionability issues, finding the hybrid use of assumptions and findings unworkable.
Castleton v Post Office Ltd & Anor (Rev1) [2026] EWCA Civ 577 (12 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal set aside a case management order that used a hybrid approach to preliminary issues about a settlement deed and unconscionability in the Post Office litigation.
Castleton v Post Office Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 158 (Ch) (30 January 2026)
The High Court ordered a split trial, with Part A issues about the settlement deed and alleged fraud to be tried before the wider claims.
Limbu & Ors v Dyson Technology Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 38 (KB) (14 January 2026)
Case management decision in migrant-worker claims against Dyson: the court orders lead claimants and a liability trial, but excludes unjust enrichment for now.
Shaheen & Anor v Daish [2025] EWHC 3056 (KB) (28 November 2025)
The High Court found a GP failed to tell a patient about a chest x-ray request, held he would have attended if informed, and rejected contributory negligence.
Court of Appeal revisited meaning, reference, and fact/opinion in a libel dispute arising from a video interview and a later website update.
The Employment Judge did not err in considering whether the appellant was disabled during the relevant period as discerned from the pleadings and submissions, and was entitled to conclude that the relevant period ended at the date of dismissal, as there was no discernible allegation of discrimination after that date.
Source excerpt
Ness v Miller [2025] EWHC 1784 (KB) (15 July 2025)
The High Court decided preliminary defamation issues in Christopher Ness's claim against Jennifer Miller, holding that the YouTube video did not refer to him and that Miller was not shown to have published the emails.
Preliminary issue in a defamation claim about comments made at a boxing press conference. The court held the words meant the claimant had frequently lied and cheated in business dealings.
The court held the claimant’s unclear defamation pleadings caused a needless second hearing and ordered him to pay 50% of the defendant’s costs, plus a £23,000 payment on account.
Explore more
