Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kyte v MclAren Automotive Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 1126 (TCC) (19 May 2026)
The High Court struck out inadequately particularised contract and negligence claims over a car fire, but allowed time to amend the pleadings.
Car-Wizard Ltd v Vixen Surface Treatments Ltd [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) (26 March 2026)
The High Court found actionable misrepresentations about a wheel lathe’s newness, capabilities, and safety, and held the claimant suffered loss.
The trial judge was entitled to conclude that the claimant had not proved, on the balance of probabilities, that the fire was caused by a defect in the vehicle. The judge was not required to choose between the two competing explanations and gave sufficient reasons for his findings. There was no error of law, misdirection, or procedural unfairness warranting appellate intervention.
Source excerpt
Wormleighton v Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd [2024] EWHC 1971 (KB) (29 July 2024)
The High Court consolidated four mesothelioma claims against Cape companies, ordering a joint liability trial in January 2025 and leaving quantum to be decided separately.
Nash v Volskwagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd [2023] EWHC 2326 (KB) (21 September 2023)
High Court appeal about causation in a vehicle fire claim under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The appeal was dismissed after the court upheld the recorder’s approach and reasoning.
The High Court dismissed HDI’s appeal, holding that significant property damage from negligent cavity wall insulation occurred during the policy period and removal costs were covered.
Coote v Ullstein [2022] EWHC 607 (QB) (11 April 2022)
Professional negligence claim dismissed on summary judgment after the court found the underlying vaccine claim had no real prospect of success.
Coote v Ullstein [2022] EWHC 607 (QB) (11 April 2022)
The High Court granted summary judgment for the defendants in a professional negligence claim arising from an alleged limitation error in MMR vaccine litigation.
Provimi France S.A.S. & Ors v Stour Bay Company Ltd [2022] EWHC 218 (Comm) (04 February 2022)
The High Court held that Stour Bay’s terms were incorporated, the Provimi Gelatin Specification was not, and the claim for damages and refund failed.
DBE Energy Ltd v Biogas Products Ltd [2020] EWHC 1232 (TCC) (18 May 2020)
The court held Biogas owed design obligations for tank heaters and pasteuriser tanks, breached those duties, and caused the equipment failures.
Explore more
