Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort law [2025] EWHC 2684 (KB)

Breeze & Anor v Chief Constable of Norfolk Constabulary

Breeze & Anor v Chief Constable of Norfolk Constabulary [2025] EWHC 2684 (KB) (17 October 2025)

High Court judgment on claims for malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office arising from the Cawston Park fraud prosecution.

  • Malicious prosecution
  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Police liability
  • Prosecutorial independence
  • Reasonable and probable cause
  • Malice
Read case analysis
Tort law [2024] EWHC 1765 (KB)

Hughes v His Majesty's Revenue and Customs & Anor

Hughes v His Majesty's Revenue and Customs & Anor [2024] EWHC 1765 (KB) (09 July 2024)

The High Court granted summary judgment for HMRC and the CPS, rejecting claims for malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, and assigned company claims.

  • Malicious prosecution
  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Assignment of claims
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Reasonable and probable cause
  • Malicious-prosecution
Read case analysis
Tort law [2018] EWHC 3287

Rudall v The Crown Prosecution Service & Anor

Rudall v The Crown Prosecution Service & Anor [2018] EWHC 3287 (QB) (30 November 2018)

High Court claim for malicious prosecution, misfeasance and HRA breach dismissed after the court found the CPS prosecutor had reasonable grounds and no malice.

  • Malicious prosecution
  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Human rights act 1998 s.6
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Reasonable and probable cause
  • Malice
Read case analysis
Tort

Rudall v The Crown Prosecution Service & Anor

The High Court dismissed Phillip Rudall’s claim for malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, and breach of s.6 HRA arising from the second Wolfram prosecution.

  • Malicious prosecution
  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Breach of human rights act s.6
  • Reasonable and probable cause
  • Malice
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis
Tort law [2018] EWHC 3287 (QB)

Rudall v The Crown Prosecution Service & Anor

Rudall v The Crown Prosecution Service & Anor [2018] EWHC 3287 (QB) (30 November 2018)

Damages claim for malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, and Human Rights Act breach dismissed after the court found reasonable and probable cause and no malice.

  • Malicious prosecution
  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Human rights act 1998 s.6
  • Reasonable and probable cause
  • Malice
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.