Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The EAT held that the tribunal wrongly refused Car Sales Solutions’ reconsideration application and remitted it to a different Employment Judge.
The Employment Tribunal failed to properly consider the entirety of Hypervolt's applications, did not apply the mandatory process required by Rule 72, and did not provide adequate reasons for its decision, warranting remittal for reconsideration.
Source excerpt
The EAT allowed an appeal against refusal of an extension of time for rehearing a nearly six-year-old reconsideration application, finding the prejudice assessment was legally flawed.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the Ministry of Justice’s appeal after finding the tribunal had relied on a materially false fact about the claimant’s bereavement.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed Mrs Cottrell’s appeal against refusal to reconsider dismissal of her claim against Avon for failure to meet ACAS early conciliation rules.
The EAT held that prior payments must be deducted before applying the unfair dismissal compensation cap, and upheld refusal to reconsider re-engagement.
Docklock Ltd v C Christo & Co Ltd [2021] EWHC 3343 (Ch) (10 December 2021)
The High Court refused Docklock’s application to reopen an occupation charge issue, holding that no sufficiently compelling reason justified reconsideration after trial.
The High Court refused Docklock’s post-trial application to reconsider the occupation charge, holding there was no compelling reason to reopen the issue.
A (A Patient, Now Deceased), Re (No 3) [2018] EWCOP 16 (13 July 2018)
The Court of Protection dismissed Desmond Fitzgerald’s paper application to reconsider two 2016 costs orders, finding his “new evidence” unsupported and his allegations meritless.
The Court of Protection dismissed Mr Fitzgerald’s application to reconsider costs orders, finding his alleged new evidence did not justify reopening the matter.
Explore more
