Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court rectified YHMS’s records after finding no 2005 transfer from Ali to Aftab, but it did accept 2015 transfers to Shaheen and Rukhsana.
The High Court dismissed a Part 8 claim seeking rescission of a land sale, holding the TR1 effective and the claimant had not proved forgery or invalidity.
Falloon v Khan & Anor [2026] EWHC 515 (Ch) (13 March 2026)
The High Court dismissed a claim seeking rescission of a land sale, holding the evidence showed a valid sale to Mr Khan and no basis to rectify the register.
UAB Business Enterprise & Anor v Oneta Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 543 (Ch) (11 March 2026)
The High Court rejected claims to rectify Oneta Limited’s register and reinstate a director, finding the settlement agreement genuine and supported by the evidence.
DG Resources Ltd v Commissioner for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 201 (Ch) (05 February 2026)
The High Court held that a winding-up petition served at a default address had not been validly served under the Insolvency Rules and struck out the petition.
The DT1 trust deed in favour of JF is void and a sham as it does not reflect the true intentions of the parties and lacks evidential basis; IF has a beneficial interest in SDF under a valid trust (DT2), or alternatively by resulting or constructive trust, entitling him to repayment of £57,500 and 40% of the net sale proceeds, with the remainder split between W and H.
Source excerpt
The tribunal ordered cancellation of a determined boundary entry after finding it was a mistake and that the disputed staircase land had been acquired by adverse possession.
Olivier v McCaughran [2025] EWHC 3308 (Ch) (15 December 2025)
The High Court dismissed an unfair prejudice petition, holding the claimant was not a shareholder or entitled to be one, so he lacked standing under section 994.
Patel & Anor v Patel & Anor [2025] UKFTT 1456 (PC) (21 November 2025)
The tribunal found the respondents were not in adverse possession for the required period and ordered rectification of the register, restoring the Duchy as proprietor.
The tribunal found the respondents were not in exclusive possession long enough for adverse possession, so their registration was a mistake and the register was rectified.
Explore more
