Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Defamation [2025] EWHC 926 (KB)

Bridgen v Hancock

Bridgen v Hancock [2025] EWHC 926 (KB) (14 April 2025)

The High Court refused to summarily dispose of a libel claim over a tweet calling an MP’s comments antisemitic, finding serious harm and honest opinion issues needed trial.

  • Libel
  • Serious harm
  • Honest opinion defence
  • Reference innuendo
  • Summary judgment
  • Strike-out
Read case analysis
Defamation

Richard (Raziel) Davidoff & Ors v Nicholas Hargrave

Evidence regarding the characteristics of the defendant’s Twitter followers is not admissible to determine whether the hypothetical reasonable reader would click on a hyperlink in the 7 May 2022 Tweet. The claimants’ pleadings of reference innuendo in relation to both the 7 May 2022 Tweet and the 11 May 2022 Post are defective but may be capable of amendment; the claimants are given an opportunity to amend their pleadings.

  • Reference innuendo
  • Pleading requirements
  • Hyperlink evidence
  • Strike out applications
  • Preliminary issues
Read case analysis
Defamation [2024] EWHC 623 (KB)

Bridgen v Hancock

Bridgen v Hancock [2024] EWHC 623 (KB) (20 March 2024)

Defamation strike-out decision on whether a tweet referred to Andrew Bridgen MP. The court held the pleading of reference was defective but allowed amendment.

  • Reference in defamation
  • Pleading requirements
  • Strike out applications
  • Reference innuendo
  • Ordinary reference
  • Identification of claimant
Read case analysis
Media law [2023] EWHC 1825 (KB)

Davidoff & Ors v Hargrave

Davidoff & Ors v Hargrave [2023] EWHC 1825 (KB) (21 July 2023)

The High Court held that evidence about a defendant’s Twitter followers was not admissible on whether readers would click a hyperlink, and allowed amended defamation pleadings.

  • Reference innuendo
  • Pleading requirements
  • Hyperlink context in defamation
  • Strike out applications
  • Preliminary issues
  • Natural and ordinary meaning
Read case analysis
Media law [2020] EWHC 1848 (QB)

Millett v Corbyn

Millett v Corbyn [2020] EWHC 1848 (QB) (10 July 2020)

The High Court held that Jeremy Corbyn’s remarks referred to Richard Millett, were defamatory, and were factual. Permission to amend to add new articles was refused.

  • Reference innuendo
  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Fact or opinion
  • Defamatory tendency
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Limitation period
Read case analysis
Defamation [2020] EWHC 1848

Millett v Corbyn

Millett v Corbyn [2020] EWHC 1848 (QB) (10 July 2020)

The High Court held that Jeremy Corbyn’s remarks in a BBC interview referred to Richard Millett, were defamatory factual allegations, and refused a late amendment to add new articles.

  • Reference innuendo
  • Meaning of statement
  • Fact or opinion
  • Defamatory tendency
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Limitation period
Read case analysis
Defamation

Millett v Corbyn

The High Court held that Jeremy Corbyn’s remarks referred to Richard Millett, were factual, and were defamatory; permission to amend to add new reference articles was refused.

  • Reference innuendo
  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Fact or opinion
  • Defamatory tendency
  • Amendment and limitation in defamation
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Defamation

Alexander-Theodotou & Ors v Kounis (Rev 1)

Defamation claim over a Facebook post and webinar failed on serious harm. The court also refused a late amendment seeking a new inducement of breach of contract claim.

  • Libel
  • Serious harm
  • Reference innuendo
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Strike-out
  • Summary judgment
Read case analysis
Defamation [2019] EWHC 956 (QB)

Alexander-Theodotou & Ors v Kounis (Rev 1)

Alexander-Theodotou & Ors v Kounis (Rev 1) [2019] EWHC 956 (QB) (16 April 2019)

High Court libel case on a Facebook post and webinar arising from Cyprus property litigation. The court dismissed the libel claim and refused amendment.

  • Libel
  • Serious harm
  • Reference innuendo
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Strike-out
  • Inducement of breach of contract
Read case analysis
Defamation [2018] EWCA Civ 2591

Economou v De Freitas

Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 (21 November 2018)

Court of Appeal libel appeal dismissed. The court upheld findings on serious harm and the section 4 public interest defence, and rejected the challenge to meaning.

  • Libel
  • Serious harm threshold
  • Public interest defence
  • Reference innuendo
  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Defamation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.