Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
County Court judgment on alleged race and religion discrimination and victimisation in Conservative Party candidate approval and disciplinary proceedings.
Arif v Baker & Ors [2026] EWCC 14 (02 April 2026)
County Court Equality Act claim arising from a Conservative Party dispute over approval, selection, discipline, and re-expulsion. The court addressed discrimination, victimisation, and limitation.
The tribunal did not err in its remedy award for discrimination, as it was entitled to find the conduct amounted to direct sex discrimination and to assess the impact accordingly. However, the tribunal erred in its approach to costs by failing to properly consider and explain whether, having found unreasonable conduct, it should award all, some, or none of the claimant's costs, and by treating certain aspects of the respondent's conduct (such as cross-examination and the unsigned witness statement) as unreasonable without sufficient reasoning.
Source excerpt
The Upper Tribunal dismissed a PIP appeal, holding that no effective remedy was available to challenge the post-pensionable-age restriction on enhanced mobility entitlement.
The EAT dismissed appeals against findings of direct age discrimination and discrimination-based compensation in an NHS consultant case.
The EAT held that paid special leave with conditions to exhaust TOIL and annual leave was not unfavourable treatment or a relevant disadvantage under the Equality Act.
The Court of Appeal held that a chief constable remains liable for alleged discrimination arising from a police misconduct panel’s acts, following P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis.
The EAT upheld the dismissal and allowed HMRC’s cross-appeal, holding that the CSCS payment was not unfavourable treatment under section 15 EqA.
The Court of Appeal held that section 124(4) and (5) of the Equality Act 2010 does not bar compensation for unintentional indirect discrimination.
The Court of Appeal held that the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift applies to employment tribunal awards for injury to feelings and psychiatric injury, and remitted the ACAS Code uplift issue.
Explore more
