Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Tesco Stores Ltd v Element & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 580 (12 May 2026)
Court of Appeal decision in an equal pay dispute about the meaning of “work” under the Equality Act 2010 and the proper scope of EAT appeals.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a disability discrimination appeal by a prison inspector, upholding the EAT’s refusal to remit the case after finding no viable discrimination claim.
Dunn v The Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 1998 (04 September 2018)
The Court of Appeal dismissed Dr Dunn’s appeal, holding the Employment Appeal Tribunal was entitled to dismiss three disability discrimination complaints without remittal.
Jafri v Lincoln College [2014] EWCA Civ 449 (16 April 2014)
Court of Appeal held that an unfair dismissal appeal failed where the only arguable point was a new issue not raised below, and the EAT had not erred in refusing remittal.
Clarence High School and Nugent Care Society v Boardman [2013] EWCA Civ 198 (15 March 2013)
Court of Appeal held the dismissal was fair under Burchell, but the ET’s wrongful dismissal reasoning was flawed because of an unsustainable finding of confession.
Hammersmith and Fulham, R (on the application of) v Food City Express Ltd. [2008] EWHC 3520 (Admin) (10 October 2008)
The High Court allowed the borough’s appeal, holding that the district judge should have heard the licensing appeal as a rehearing rather than remit it because he thought ten minutes was too short.
The Court of Appeal remitted an Article 8 immigration appeal to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, holding proportionality should be decided by the specialist tribunal.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to a SENDIST decision about a child's special educational needs, holding that limited remission to amend the statement was proper.
The Court of Appeal upheld the Burns procedure, holding that the EAT may invite an employment tribunal to clarify or supplement its reasons after judgment.
The High Court quashed the Immigration Appeal Tribunal’s remittal of an asylum appeal, holding that it had misunderstood key evidence and that the adjudicator’s brief credibility findings were sufficient.
Explore more
