Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed publication of care judgments, anonymising only the child RR and her father, and varied the Transparency Order accordingly.
Blackpool Borough Council v RR & Ors [2026] EWHC 1100 (Fam) (14 May 2026)
The court ruled on publication and anonymisation in care proceedings, ordering publication of the judgments with only RR and her father anonymised.
Appeal dismissed against refusal to discharge a Court of Protection Transparency Order. The judge held the order proportionately protected P’s privacy and placement stability.
EF v The London Borough of Hackney & Anor [2026] EWCOP 20 (T3) (05 May 2026)
Appeal dismissed against refusal to discharge a Court of Protection Transparency Order preserving anonymity and reporting restrictions in P’s welfare proceedings.
The County Court refused the claimant’s late application for anonymity, holding that open justice prevailed and the evidence did not justify restricting publication.
Idziak v Merlin Entertainment PLC & Anor [2026] EWCC 24 (30 April 2026)
The County Court refused the claimant’s post-trial application for anonymity, holding that open justice prevailed and the evidence did not justify derogation.
CX (A child), Re (Reporting restrictions order: National security) [2026] EWHC 994 (Fam) (29 April 2026)
The High Court allowed anonymised reporting and disclosure of documents from concluded child welfare proceedings, subject to redactions and reporting restrictions protecting privacy and national security.
The High Court allowed anonymised reporting and disclosure in family proceedings involving a child, subject to strict restrictions and redactions, including safeguards for national security.
Fordham J discharged interim anonymity and reporting restrictions in UWO/IFO proceedings, holding that open justice outweighed the respondent’s Article 8 privacy claim.
National Crime Agency v GKC (No.2) [2026] EWHC 929 (Admin) (24 April 2026)
The Administrative Court discharged interim anonymity and reporting restrictions in UWO/IFO proceedings, holding that open justice prevailed over Article 8 concerns.
Explore more
