Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Pandora Jewellery UK Ltd & Anor v EML Payments Europe Ltd [2026] EWHC 1047 (Comm) (06 May 2026)
The High Court held that EML’s duty to make breakage payments ended when the agreement terminated, and dismissed the claim for Expired Funds.
KI v SI (Sham trusts and intervenor proceedings in financial remedy claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B) (19 March 2026)
The Family Court held that a trust deed in favour of the wife’s mother was a sham, upheld the father’s trust arrangement, and apportioned sale proceeds of land accordingly.
The court found that the respondent retained beneficial ownership of the family home and other assets through resulting trusts and nominee arrangements, that the pre-nuptial agreement was invalid and unfair, and that the applicant was entitled to a financial order reflecting the parties' high standard of living and available resources. The respondent's litigation misconduct and dishonesty justified drawing adverse inferences and making the order sought by the applicant.
Source excerpt
Narroya v Narroya (Beneficial interests - implied trusts - Pallant v Morgan constructive trusts - resulting trusts - whether express declarations of trust genuine - priority rules - parties to order - effect of consent order) [2026] UKFTT 166 (PC) (20 January 2026)
The Tribunal dismissed a brother’s claim to a 50% beneficial interest in three Derby properties, finding no constructive or resulting trust and that trust deeds were not genuine.
The tribunal dismissed a husband’s claim to beneficial interests in three Derby properties, finding no constructive or resulting trust and rejecting alleged declarations of trust as not genuine.
Morgan & Ors v Estate of Terence David Morgan Deceased & Ors [2026] EWHC 20 (Ch) (08 January 2026)
The High Court partly upheld a family trust claim over cash used for a proposed home purchase, dismissing Mrs Morgan’s claim but allowing Miss Msomi’s claim for £9,800.
The High Court held that the only possible Quistclose trust ended once the loan monies were applied to the development, so the claim had no realistic prospect of success.
Anderson & Anor v Curtis & Ors [2025] EWHC 3290 (Ch) (18 December 2025)
The High Court held that any Quistclose trust ended once loan funds were applied to the development, so the claimants had no proprietary claim or breach of trust case.
Blann v Cookhill Cricket Club Ltd (BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP - RESULTING TRUST - restriction- grant to unincorporated association) [2025] UKFTT 1155 (PC) (03 September 2025)
The tribunal held that Cookhill Cricket Club had no beneficial interest in the cricket ground. Grant funds were not club funds for a resulting trust, and the registration restriction was cancelled.
The tribunal rejected a claim that Cookhill Cricket Club had a beneficial interest in the cricket ground, holding the restricted grant funds did not create a resulting trust.
Explore more
