Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal dismissed MK’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, holding there was no error of law or fact and no unfairness in the evidence process.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed CC’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, finding no material mistake of fact or law and confirming her inclusion on both barred lists.
The Upper Tribunal upheld DBS’s decision to bar KCN from work with children and adults, finding no mistake of law or fact despite his criminal acquittal.
The Upper Tribunal allowed Mrs B’s appeal against inclusion on the children’s barred list, finding DBS had made a material factual mistake about an alleged conversation.
The Upper Tribunal upheld HZ’s inclusion on the Adults’ Barred List but found error in her inclusion on the Children’s Barred List and ordered her removal.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed SS’s appeal against DBS inclusion on the adults’ and children’s barred lists, finding no mistake of fact or law.
The Upper Tribunal allowed HET’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, found multiple mistakes of fact, and ordered her removal from both barred lists.
The Upper Tribunal held that JR satisfied the regulated activity test and had engaged in relevant conduct, but his inclusion on the adults’ barred list was disproportionate.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against DBS retention on the Children’s and Adults’ Barred Lists, finding no material factual or legal error and no disproportionality.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed MM’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, finding no material error of fact or law in the DBS’s findings, risk assessment, or proportionality.
Explore more
