Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Credit Suisse Virtuoso Sicav-Sif & Anor v Softbank Group Corp & Ors [2025] EWHC 2631 (Ch) (15 October 2025)
High Court section 423 claim over the Greensill/Katerra financing structure and the $440 million Fairymead Notes, involving SoftBank entities and Greensill Limited.
High Court Financial List judgment on a section 423 Insolvency Act claim arising from the Greensill/Katerra restructuring and SoftBank-related transactions.
County Court appeal in a mortgage possession claim allowed the defence to stand, holding the summary strike-out was premature given unresolved issues over equitable assignment and enforcement.
Lloyds Bank PLC v Cook [2025] EWCC 43 (24 July 2025)
Appeal against strike-out of a defence to a possession claim was allowed because the defence raised a real prospect of success on assignment and entitlement issues.
The Deeds are contracts of indemnity imposing primary obligations on CMIS. The Relevant Amounts are 'due' under the EMAC Master Agreements and payable by CMIS under the Deeds. CMIS is not entitled to rely on Payment Deferral or Limited Recourse Provisions as a defence under clause 2.1(iv).
Source excerpt
NatWest Market NV & Anor v CMIS Nederland BV & Anor [2025] EWHC 37 (Comm) (15 January 2025)
The High Court held that CMIS’s deeds were indemnities, not guarantees, so CMIS had to pay NatWest the claimed swap-related sums and could not rely on deferral provisions.
BNP Paribas Trust Corporation UK Ltd v Uro Property Holdings SA [2024] EWHC 2542 (Comm) (24 September 2024)
The Commercial Court allowed only a construction amendment and refused estoppel and breach of contract amendments as late, prejudicial, and weak.
Banca Generali SPA v Sovereign Credit Opportunities SA & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 886 (31 July 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that, after a Trigger Notice, senior noteholders could direct the issuer to remove and replace the fiscal agent under the transaction documents.
The Court of Appeal held that, after default and a Trigger Notice, senior noteholders could direct the issuer to remove and replace the fiscal agent under the transaction documents.
Banca Generali SpA v Sovereign Credit Opportunities SA & Anor [2023] EWHC 1732 (Ch) (11 July 2023)
The High Court construed securitisation documents and held that senior noteholders could direct removal of the Fiscal Agent, but not the Calculation Agent, after trigger notices.
Explore more
