Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court granted permission to amend particulars of claim in a joint venture dispute, struck out the original particulars, and ordered the claimant to pay costs.
Allergan PLC & Ors v Competition and Markets Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 1023 (06 September 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that the CMA’s Chapter I case was properly put to witnesses, overturned the Tribunal’s dishonesty findings, and reinstated the infringement findings.
Global 100 Ltd v Laleva [2021] EWCA Civ 1835 (03 December 2021)
The Court of Appeal held that a property-guardian agreement was a licence, not a tenancy, and confirmed the CPR Part 55.8(2) threshold matches summary judgment.
Interlocutory ruling refusing to split a trial about settlement agreements from the underlying dispute. The judge left prior case management directions in place and awarded costs.
Goldtrail Travel Ltd v Aydin & Ors [2014] EWHC 1587 (Ch) (22 May 2014)
The High Court held that Mr Aydin misapplied Goldtrail’s funds and breached fiduciary duties, and that Black Pearl defendants dishonestly assisted those breaches.
The High Court held that a settlement agreement between P&H and the Garrads was genuine and enforceable, rejecting sham and illegality defences and dismissing the counterclaims.
Appeal allowed in a land-registration dispute. The High Court remitted the case for rehearing and held the adjudicator had not resolved key issues on sham and beneficial ownership.
Chancery Division judgment on a property development joint venture, addressing the JVA, side agreement, guarantee, fiduciary duties, and Net Profits calculation.
Court of Appeal held that Mr Brumwell managed Wyeside Caravan and Camping Park as agent for the Council, so he had no tenancy and no 1954 Act renewal right.
Brumwell v Powys County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1613 (21 December 2011)
The Court of Appeal held that Mr Brumwell managed the caravan park as the Council’s agent, not as tenant, so he had no right to a new tenancy.
Explore more
