Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed counterclaims over alleged Yodel share warrants, finding the documents were forged, backdated, and unsupported by genuine execution.
Yodel Delivery Network Ltd v Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 3355 (Ch) (18 December 2025)
The High Court held that the disputed Second Warrant Instrument and certificates were false, with forged signatures, and dismissed Shift and Corja’s counterclaims.
The court dismissed the application for an interim injunction because damages would be an adequate remedy for Shift and Corja if they succeed on the Warrant Claim, and the cross-undertaking in damages offered by Shift and Corja is inadequate due to lack of assets. There is a serious issue to be tried on the Warrant Claim, but the balance of convenience also favours Yodel, as the injunction would be over-intrusive and impede necessary transformation of the business. Permission is granted for Corja to amend to bring the Warrant Claim, and the trial of the Warrant Claim is to be expedited and tr…
Source excerpt
Yodel Delivery Network Ltd v Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) (11 June 2025)
The court refused an interim injunction to halt Yodel’s transformation, held there was a serious issue on the warrant dispute, and allowed Corja’s amendment.
Charles Stanley Group Plc, Re [2021] EWHC 359 (Ch) (20 August 2021)
The High Court held that late use of Schedule 4 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 was time-barred, so no suspended cancellation order could be made.
AMG Global Nominees (Private) Ltd v SMM Holdings Ltd & Anor. [2008] EWHC 221 (Ch) (13 February 2008)
The court held ARL was not in default under the SPA/MDC, so T & N's power of sale had not arisen. The SSA to AMG was ineffective, and the financial assistance challenge failed.
Oxus Gold Plc & Anor v Templeton Insurance Ltd [2007] EWHC 770 (Comm) (04 April 2007)
The court assessed damages for Templeton after Oxus failed to deliver shares under a warrants deed, applying the market price rule and rejecting extra adjustment claims.
The Commercial Court held that Templeton was entitled to damages for non-delivery of 5 million Oxus shares, valued at the market price on 13 January 2004.
Platinum Investment Trust Plc v Knox D' Arcy Asset Management Ltd [2006] EWHC 1893 (Ch) (25 July 2006)
The High Court refused to rectify a warrant deed beyond the parties’ actual agreement, holding that Platinum had not proved the broader formula it sought.
Wecomm Ltd. v Rosenhoiz [2004] EWHC 1854 (QB) (05 August 2004)
The High Court held that a former CEO must repay improperly claimed expenses and £10,000 cash, and dismissed his counterclaims because he resigned, not dismissed.
Explore more
