Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Defamation

Frank Warren v Christopher Livingstone Eubank Jnr

Preliminary issue in a defamation claim about comments made at a boxing press conference. The court held the words meant the claimant had frequently lied and cheated in business dealings.

  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Libel
  • Slander
  • Preliminary issues
  • Defamation
  • Meaning-of-words
Read case analysis
Defamation

Richard Parsons v Douglas Atkinson

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant published the defamatory letter as alleged. Accordingly, the claims for defamation and misuse of private information fail.

  • Libel
  • Slander
  • Misuse of private information
  • Publication
  • Serious harm
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Defamation

John Oliver v Jaine Duffy

The Claimant failed to prove the Defendant used the word 'paedophile'; the words used were 'go away you horrible peedo', meaning 'dirty old man' who subjects younger women to unwelcome sexual interest. The words were defamatory at common law but did not impute a crime for which the Claimant could be punished, nor did the Claimant prove special damage or serious harm as required by Defamation Act 2013 s.1. The claim for slander therefore fails.

  • Slander
  • Serious harm
  • Truth defence
  • Honest opinion defence
  • Special damage
  • Publication
Read case analysis
Tort law [2024] EWHC 2590 (KB)

Oliver v Duffy

Oliver v Duffy [2024] EWHC 2590 (KB) (11 October 2024)

High Court slander claim dismissed after the court found the defendant said “go away you horrid peedo,” meaning “dirty old man,” not “paedophile.”

  • Defamation
  • Slander
  • Defences to defamation
  • Serious harm requirement
  • Truth defence
  • Honest opinion defence
Read case analysis
Defamation [2023] EWCA Civ 884

Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor

Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 884 (25 July 2023)

The Court of Appeal held that a broadcast about Dyson referred to Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson Limited, allowing their defamation appeal.

  • Identification in defamation
  • Reference to claimant
  • Libel
  • Slander
  • Corporate reputation
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Employment law [2021] EWHC 3454 (QB)

Kostakopolou v University of Warwick & Ors

Kostakopolou v University of Warwick & Ors [2021] EWHC 3454 (QB) (21 December 2021)

High Court strike-out judgment in a university disciplinary defamation claim. The court held the claim was barred by leave and licence, qualified privilege, and Johnson.

  • Strike out applications
  • Summary judgment
  • Qualified privilege
  • Leave and licence
  • Malicious falsehood
  • Libel
Read case analysis
Contract law [2021] EWHC 3432 (Ch)

Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd & Anor

Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 3432 (Ch) (17 December 2021)

High Court judgment on introduction fees, novation, estoppel and defamation arising from the Octave Contract dispute over 2B and Crown.

  • Novation
  • Rectification
  • Estoppel by convention
  • Quantum meruit
  • Malicious falsehood
  • Slander
Read case analysis
Defamation [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB)

Hwang v Kim

Hwang v Kim [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB) (08 December 2021)

High Court defamation trial on alleged slanders at Korean community events. The court held the words did not impute criminal conduct and dismissed the claim.

  • Slander actionable per se
  • Imputation of criminal conduct
  • Serious harm to reputation
  • Defamation act 2013
  • Truth defence
  • Defamation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.