Fajr Ellis, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education & Anor
The challenge to the 2016 Regulations was out of time and, even if in time, would fail as the distinction in loan provision for prisoners is justified and proportionate. The general restrictions on access to education in prison were operational, not systemic, and did not breach A2P1 or Article 14. The decision to remove the Claimant's Chromebook was procedurally unfair, failed to consider relevant evidence, and was not justified on the facts, thus unlawful as a matter of domestic public law, but did not amount to a breach of A2P1.
Source excerpt
- Right to education
- Prisoners' rights
- Discrimination
- Judicial review procedure
- Student loans
- Procedural fairness