Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court refused to strike out a knowing receipt claim and allowed amendments adding unjust enrichment, dishonest assistance, unlawful conspiracy, and Companies Act claims.
Metal NRG PLC v BritEnergy Holdings LLP & Ors [2023] EWHC 1521 (Ch) (17 March 2023)
The High Court refused permission to appeal, holding that five April 2021 documents formed a single arrangement under s.190 Companies Act 2006.
The High Court refused permission to appeal on whether five April 2021 documents formed one “arrangement” under s.190 Companies Act 2006.
High Court company law judgment on a family business restructure, examining Duomatic consent, directors’ duties, and liability for a substantial property transaction.
Terry & Ors v Watchstone Ltd [2018] EWHC 3082 (Comm) (16 November 2018)
The High Court held that Watchstone Limited had agreed an indemnity for the claimants’ tax liabilities arising from the 2011 sale of shares, and the company’s restitution counterclaim failed.
The High Court ordered rectification of the register, restoring KPDC’s charge and title to Alder Road, and entered judgment for the debt secured by the charge.
The High Court dismissed a liquidator’s claim against a former director arising from a pre-liquidation asset sale, finding no breach of duty and no recoverable loss.
Hedger v Adams [2015] EWHC 2540 (Ch) (02 September 2015)
Liquidator’s misfeasance claim over a pre-liquidation asset sale to a connected company failed; the court found no breach of duty and no loss.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Smithton’s appeal, holding that Mr Naggar was neither a de facto nor shadow director and that section 190 CA 2006 did not apply.
Smithton Ltd v Naggar [2014] EWCA Civ 939 (10 July 2014)
The Court of Appeal dismissed Smithton’s appeal, upholding the finding that Mr Naggar was neither a de facto nor shadow director and that section 190 CA 2006 was not engaged.
Explore more
