Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Public law

Brenda Hughes, R (on the application of) v Kirklees Council

The Court of Appeal dismissed a judicial review appeal over Kirklees Council’s decision to sell two dementia care homes, rejecting irrationality and material-misleadingness challenges.

  • Irrationality challenge
  • Local authority decision-making
  • Dementia care provision
  • Tameside duty
  • Judicial review procedure
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law

BUJ, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Bromley

Although the Defendant failed to consult users of Poverest Centre before deciding to close it, the evidence shows it is highly likely that consultation would not have changed the outcome, given the Defendant's financial and housing imperatives and mitigation plans. Therefore, relief must be refused under s.31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act 1981.

  • Judicial review
  • Consultation duty
  • Public sector equality duty
  • Tameside duty
  • Local authority decision-making
  • Adult education services
Read case analysis
Public law [2026] EWHC 74 (Admin)

The Howard League for Penal Reform, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice

The Howard League for Penal Reform, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice [2026] EWHC 74 (Admin) (19 January 2026)

The High Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to the limited rollout of PAVA spray in three young offender institutions, rejecting PSED, Tameside and irrationality grounds.

  • Public sector equality duty
  • Use of force in prisons
  • Judicial review
  • Equality act 2010
  • Irrationality
  • Tameside duty
Read case analysis
Public law

Mahmod, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice

The policy framework test at paragraph 3.4.11 is lawful, rational, and does not fetter discretion; the PPCS's decision not to refer the claimant to the Parole Board was rational and properly considered all relevant evidence; the sifting process was procedurally fair and did not require further opportunity for submissions beyond the SPRM process.

  • Judicial review
  • Parole process
  • Policy framework
  • Procedural fairness
  • Irrationality
  • Discretion
Read case analysis
Public law

PJSC VTB Bank v HM Treasury

The High Court dismissed PJSC VTB Bank’s judicial review of OFSI’s amended sanctions licence affecting VTB Capital’s insolvency and creditor distributions.

  • Judicial review of administrative decisions
  • Sanctions regime
  • Licensing under sanctions
  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Procedural fairness
  • Padfield principle
Read case analysis
Public law

Sahayb Abu v Secretary of State for Justice

Judicial review of prison segregation in a Separation Centre, addressing Rule 45, mental health inquiries, Articles 3 and 8 ECHR, and equality duties.

  • Segregation of prisoners
  • Rule 45 prison rules
  • Article 3 echr
  • Article 8 echr
  • Public sector equality duty
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2025] EWHC 2891 (Admin)

National Association of Head Teachers & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) & Anor

National Association of Head Teachers & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) & Anor [2025] EWHC 2891 (Admin) (05 November 2025)

The High Court refused permission for judicial review of Ofsted’s 2025 inspection framework, finding no arguable predetermination, consultation failure, or unlawful impact assessment.

  • Consultation requirements
  • Predetermination
  • Rationality
  • Relevant considerations
  • Tameside duty
  • Echr article 2
Read case analysis
Administrative law

AB, R (on the application of) v Bristol City Council

The duty to consult under section 27(3) Children and Families Act 2014 is not triggered by entering SVAs; local authorities have discretion subject to rationality. The Public Sector Equality Duty was discharged at the appropriate stage given the high-level nature of the SVA decision. Devon County Council did not act irrationally or fail to make reasonable inquiries before entering the SVA. Entering the SVA did not frustrate the legislative purpose of Part 3 of the 2014 Act. No secret policy was operated.

  • Judicial review
  • Public sector equality duty
  • Consultation duty
  • Send funding
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Budgetary decisions
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Nobel Oil E&P North Sea Limited, R (on the application of) v The Oil and Gas Authority t/a The North Sea Transition Authority & Ors

Judicial review over Gryphon FPSO decommissioning failed. The court found no predetermination, procedural unfairness, statutory breach, or inadequate reasons.

  • Judicial review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Regulatory decision-making
  • Bias and procedural fairness
  • Decommissioning of petroleum infrastructure
  • Maximum economic recovery (mer)
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.