Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Wenda Co Ltd v Jinhong & Ors [2026] EWHC 909 (Comm) (24 April 2026)
Commercial Court judgment on invoice financing, fiduciary duties, dishonesty, and tracing; Wenda succeeded on most claims, but its claim against Mr Petit was dismissed.
Shiloh is bound by the 2024 Judgment as a privy and by abuse of process; the funds used to acquire the properties can be traced to assets misappropriated from Umbrella; all elements of knowing receipt are established against Shiloh, including knowledge attributable from Mr and Mrs Oronsaye; Shiloh's defences are wholly without merit; summary judgment is granted for Umbrella establishing a constructive trust over the properties in the specified proportions.
Source excerpt
L&S Accounting Firm Umbrella Ltd v Shiloh House Holdings Ltd [2026] EWHC 618 (Ch) (13 March 2026)
The High Court granted summary judgment for Umbrella, holding Shiloh bound by earlier fraud findings and allowing tracing into properties acquired with diverted funds.
High Court Chancery decision on alleged dishonest extraction of funds from property project SPVs, involving secret commissions, sham documentation, and intermediary companies.
The High Court held that the only possible Quistclose trust ended once the loan monies were applied to the development, so the claim had no realistic prospect of success.
The Commercial Court refused SKAT permission to appeal after trial, holding its proposed grounds were factual challenges with no realistic prospect of success.
Skatteforvaltningen v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025] EWHC 2979 (Comm) (14 November 2025)
The High Court refused SKAT permission to appeal after trial findings rejecting deceit, unjust enrichment, and proprietary claims in the Solo Capital litigation.
Barnett v General Subsidiary 2 Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 2830 (Ch) (07 November 2025)
The High Court held that Cyan was entitled to funds held by the administrator, rejecting the GM Companies’ agency theory and adjourning HPL’s trust claim.
Gable Insurance AG v Dewsall & Ors [2025] EWHC 2280 (Ch) (05 September 2025)
The court considered alleged misappropriation of GIAG funds, breaches of director duties under Liechtenstein law, tracing into Weald Hall, and related English equitable claims.
The claimant was not entitled to any share of the proceeds from the sale of the Brentwood Hotel or Stockland Street property. The court found that the claimant and first defendant were partners at will until 2011, when the claimant was bought out through refinancing and payment. There was no express or implied trust, no proprietary estoppel, and no constructive trust in the claimant's favour after 2011. The claimant's evidence was found to be dishonest, including fabrication of the existence of 'Aamer Gull'. Even if the claims had merit, the claimant would have been barred from equitable reli…
Source excerpt
Explore more
