Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment-law

Grantham v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

The EAT dismissed Mr Grantham’s appeal, holding that any failure to consider medical evidence about autism was not material to the strike out and reconsideration decisions.

  • Strike-out
  • Unless-order
  • Reconsideration
  • Reasonable-adjustments
  • Disability-discrimination
  • Unfair-dismissal
Read case analysis
Employment-law

B Kristensen v Portman Healthcare Limited

The EAT allowed an appeal in part in a whistleblowing and unfair dismissal case, correcting errors on principal reason, suspension, and limitation issues.

  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Whistleblowing
  • Protected-disclosure-detriment
  • Wrongful-dismissal
  • Limitation-under-section-48-era
  • Employment-tribunal-reasons-and-meek-compliance
Read case analysis
Employment-law

M Jarosinski v Nestle UK Ltd

The EAT dismissed Mr Jarosinski’s appeal, holding that Nestle’s consolidated response was valid, any objection was waived, and the 100% remedy deductions were adequately reasoned.

  • Reconsideration
  • Et3-response
  • Consolidated-claims
  • Unfair-dismissal-remedy
  • Polkey-reduction
  • Contributory-fault
Read case analysis
Employment-law

E Komeng v National Highways Limited

The EAT held that a fixed-term employee's exclusion from training could amount to less favourable treatment without a separate detriment finding, but the appeal failed on justification and time.

  • Fixed-term-employment
  • Less-favourable-treatment
  • Objective-justification
  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Employment-training
Read case analysis
Employment-law

Clifton Diocese v Janet Parker

The EAT held that the tribunal erred in its burden-of-proof analysis on religion or belief discrimination and harassment, but upheld unfair and wrongful dismissal findings.

  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Wrongful-dismissal
  • Religion-or-belief-discrimination
  • Burden-of-proof
  • Harassment
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Employment-law

L Tarbuc v Martello Piling Limited

The EAT held that section 111A ERA 1996 is claim-specific, allowed disclosure for non-unfair-dismissal claims, and remitted the improper-conduct issue.

  • Protected-conversations
  • Section-111a-employment-rights-act-1996
  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Unlawful-deduction-from-wages
  • Part-time-worker-discrimination
  • Improper-conduct
Read case analysis
Employment-law

M Mulumba v Partners Group (UK) Ltd & Anor

The EAT dismissed an appeal against case management decisions, holding that the tribunal was entitled to remove a July 2018 meeting issue and exclude parts of a reply statement.

  • Territorial-jurisdiction
  • Case-management
  • Exclusion-of-evidence
  • Direct-discrimination
  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Employment-appeal
Read case analysis
Employment-law

Anthony Boateng v Moss Bros Group Limited

The EAT upheld strike-out of Equality Act claims as no longer capable of a fair trial and upheld refusal to postpone the unfair dismissal hearing.

  • Strike-out
  • Postponement
  • Discrimination
  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Practice-and-procedure
  • Employment-appeal-tribunal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.