Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a section 994 unfair prejudice petition concerning Liberas Solutions Ltd, finding the challenged payments, banking controls and consultant arrangements were justified.
The High Court allowed Segulah to amend its deceit claim, finding the proposed implied-misrepresentation case had a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial.
The High Court refused security for costs in an appeal where fresh evidence suggested the underlying share valuation may have been flawed and previous costs orders might be unsafe.
Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2025] EWHC 2757 (Ch) (07 October 2025)
The High Court refused Mr Hashmi’s application for security for costs in an appeal, citing fresh evidence, possible fraud issues, and the risk of procedural unfairness.
Ronnan & Anor v Stansfield & Anor [2025] EWHC 2034 (Ch) (28 July 2025)
The High Court struck out a section 994 unfair prejudice petition brought by majority shareholders, holding they could have used corporate control to seek a company remedy.
The High Court allowed an amendment to a Part 18 response and directed expert evidence on share valuation and mitigation in a professional negligence claim against solicitors.
Sodi-Tech EDM Ltd & Anor v DJM Law Ltd [2025] EWHC 981 (Ch) (29 April 2025)
The High Court allowed amendments to a Part 18 response in a professional negligence claim and directed share-valuation expert evidence on mitigation and loss.
Burdett v Burdett & Anor [2025] EWHC 480 (Ch) (04 March 2025)
The court dismissed Sheila Burdett’s unfair prejudice petition and David Burdett’s trust claim over 72 High Street after a trial on disputed family company documents.
Grewal v Chakraborty & Ors [2025] EWHC 709 (Ch) (04 February 2025)
The High Court refused Mr Grewal permission to appeal, certified the appeal as totally without merit, and indicated an Extended Civil Restraint Order was justified.
The High Court refused to let Peter Waddell amend his petition to attack TopCo’s filing of a defence, refused a stay of the Part 7 claim, and allowed joint case management.
Explore more
