A Mother v A Father
The court found the children were habitually resident in England and Wales and wrongfully retained in Costa Rica by the father. The respondent’s failure to engage, the risk of onward abduction to a non-Hague country, the emotional harm to the children, and the need for swift action constituted good reasons to exercise the inherent jurisdiction and order their immediate return, rather than await the outcome of Hague Convention proceedings.
Source excerpt
- Wardship
- Inherent jurisdiction
- Hague convention 1980
- Summary return orders
- Habitual residence