Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal refused reconsideration of permission to appeal in a tax dispute, holding there was no arguable error in the FTT’s treatment of an HMRC barring application.
Upper Tribunal held the First-tier Tribunal used the wrong legal approach and gave inadequate reasons when rejecting proposed EHC plan provisions, but did not set the decision aside.
The Upper Tribunal allowed this Universal Credit appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal failed to address the appellant’s shoulder impairment and gave inadequate reasons.
Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary, R (On the Application Of) v Police Misconduct Panel [2026] EWHC 467 (Admin) (09 February 2026)
The High Court quashed the sanction imposed by a police misconduct panel, finding inadequate reasoning for final written warnings, but upheld its findings on the officers' conduct.
Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal in a DLA case, finding the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by failing to adequately examine evidence and reasons about supervision and restraint.
Eslami v North Tyneside Magistrates' Court [2026] EWHC 219 (Admin) (05 February 2026)
Judicial review of a magistrates’ refusal to vary an account freezing order was allowed because the reasons were inadequate and failed to address the statutory test.
Tobin v The Welsh Ministers & Anor [2026] EWHC 171 (Admin) (30 January 2026)
High Court planning appeal dismissed after the judge held that the inspector had properly considered disability rights and gave adequate reasons for refusing permission for a porch.
The Upper Tribunal allowed LK’s appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons for rejecting entitlement to Disability Living Allowance care component.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal in a PIP case, finding the First-tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons, relied too heavily on an HCP report, and failed to probe key evidence.
The Upper Tribunal allowed CB’s appeal, set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision for legal error, and remitted the compensation claim for reconsideration.
Explore more
