The High Court allowed a proposed all-spills causation amendment in Bille oil-spill litigation and granted permission for an aggravated damages amendment.
Rzucek v Vinnicombe [2026] EWHC 946 (KB) (23 April 2026)
The High Court awarded defamation damages and an injunction over YouTube videos about the Watts case, but dismissed the harassment remedy for want of jurisdiction.
The Privy Council restored a defamation claim in principle, holding that the Court of Appeal wrongly reversed liability on the first statement and wrongly reduced damages to a nominal sum.
The respondent's placement of the claimant on restricted duties and intrusive questioning were acts of direct disability discrimination, harassment, and unfavourable treatment arising from disability, not justified by any legitimate aim or proportionate means. The respondent failed to conduct a proper risk assessment, relied on stigma and misconceptions about HIV, and did not consider less restrictive alternatives. The conduct caused significant injury to feelings and was aggravated by the respondent's disclosure of the claimant's diagnosis without consent.
The High Court ordered lead claimants and a split liability trial in this group action, refused a preliminary issues trial on assumed facts, and allowed limited early disclosure.
High Court chancery appeal on damages for unlawful eviction, trespass, harassment and special damages, with most grounds dismissed and one minor reduction made.
WLP Trading & Marketing Ltd v Albalous & Anor [2025] EWHC 3357 (Ch) (19 December 2025)
Appeal against damages for unlawful eviction, trespass, harassment and related claims largely failed, with only a limited correction to R2’s special damages.
Alta Trading UK Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Ors [2025] EWHC 1837 (Comm) (18 July 2025)
The High Court adjourned a strike-out application over dishonesty allegations linked to a freezing order, finding the allegations may be relevant to causation in the damages inquiry.
The High Court held that dishonesty allegations in a damages inquiry after discharge of a freezing order may be relevant to causation, so the strike-out application was adjourned.