Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court held that Mr Aristodemou’s conduct unfairly prejudiced Mr Chambi, including misapplied company funds, false accounts, and asset diversion.
The High Court dismissed counterclaims over alleged Yodel share warrants, finding the documents were forged, backdated, and unsupported by genuine execution.
The applicants failed to establish that the balance of convenience favoured the grant of interim injunctive relief, as there was insufficient urgency, the evidence supporting the presence of remains was thin, and the applicants' conduct (deception, harassment, threats) was egregious and directly connected to the relief sought, engaging the clean hands doctrine. The court refused the application for interim relief.
Source excerpt
Levinson & Anor v Cross & Ors [2025] EWHC 3148 (Ch) (25 November 2025)
The High Court refused an interim injunction and dismissed an application to allow a ground-penetrating radar survey at a London property linked to the search for Muriel McKay’s remains.
The court dismissed Adam Scott’s proprietary estoppel, probate, and sham tenancy claims, upholding the disputed wills and finding no net detriment.
The High Court granted an interim proprietary injunction over shares or sale proceeds, finding a serious issue over trust, urgency, and no adequate damages remedy.
DBLP Sea Cow Ltd v Steffenson [2025] EWHC 2732 (Ch) (02 October 2025)
The High Court granted a holding proprietary injunction over shares or their sale proceeds in a dispute over whether a 16 May 2025 SPA created a trust.
The claimant was not entitled to any share of the proceeds from the sale of the Brentwood Hotel or Stockland Street property. The court found that the claimant and first defendant were partners at will until 2011, when the claimant was bought out through refinancing and payment. There was no express or implied trust, no proprietary estoppel, and no constructive trust in the claimant's favour after 2011. The claimant's evidence was found to be dishonest, including fabrication of the existence of 'Aamer Gull'. Even if the claims had merit, the claimant would have been barred from equitable reli…
Source excerpt
The Court found that TYG Oncology Limited is functionally deadlocked and that there has been a total breakdown of trust and confidence between directors, in a company properly considered a quasi-partnership. No alternative remedy exists and the Petitioner is not barred by the clean hands doctrine. Winding up is just and equitable.
Source excerpt
OncoQR ML GmbH v Jacobs & Ors [2025] EWHC 1567 (Ch) (17 June 2025)
The High Court ordered TYG Oncology Limited wound up on just and equitable grounds, finding functional deadlock, irretrievable breakdown, and no realistic alternative remedy.
Explore more
