Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

R v Matthew Ashby

The Court of Appeal dismissed Matthew Ashby’s sentence appeal, holding that the judge properly assessed mitigation, totality, and drug-offence starting points.

  • Sentencing
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Drug offences
  • Driving offences
  • Domestic violence
  • Appeal-against-sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 635

Ashby, R. v

Ashby, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 635 (24 April 2026)

Court of Appeal dismissed a sentence appeal by Matthew Ashby, holding that the 80-month total sentence properly reflected domestic violence, drug supply, driving offences, mitigation, and totality.

  • Sentencing
  • Appeal
  • Drug offences
  • Driving offences
  • Domestic violence
  • Totality principle
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v John Seal

The sentence imposed, though slightly above the category range for a category B3 offence, was justified due to high culpability, borderline harm, and the domestic context; credit for guilty plea was generous; the disqualification order required correction but did not affect the overall outcome.

  • Grievous bodily harm
  • Domestic violence
  • Sentencing
  • Driving offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Dragnev v Bulgarian Judicial Authority

Permission to appeal is granted on ground one, limited to whether the appellant deliberately absented himself from his trial for the first offence, and on ground two, limited to reconsideration of Article 8 balance if partial discharge occurs.

  • Extradition
  • Absence from trial
  • Article 8 echr
  • Driving offences
Read case analysis
Transport law

Meirion Harrison v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

The appellant, having received 6 penalty points for a CU80 offence, does not meet the statutory requirement to be a fit and proper person to remain on the Register of Approved Driving Instructors. There are no exceptional circumstances to justify departure from the Registrar's decision, and the appellant's arguments did not demonstrate sufficient understanding of the gravity of the offence or its impact on public perception.

  • Approved driving instructors
  • Fitness and propriety
  • Driving offences
  • Statutory appeals
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Simon Howarth v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

The Tribunal dismissed an appeal against removal from the Approved Driving Instructors register after two speeding offences and a failure to notify the Registrar.

  • Fitness and propriety
  • Professional standards
  • Driving offences
  • Register removal
  • Fitness-and-propriety
  • Professional-registration
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Tasawer Yasin v Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

The appellant, having received six penalty points for a mobile phone offence while driving, does not meet the statutory requirement to be a fit and proper person to remain on the Register of Approved Driving Instructors. There are no exceptional circumstances to justify departure from removal, and the Registrar's decision was correct.

  • Removal from professional register
  • Fitness and propriety
  • Driving offences
  • Statutory interpretation
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 1527

Seal, R. v

Seal, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1527 (12 September 2025)

The Court of Appeal dismissed John Seal’s sentence appeal for a violent domestic GBH offence, holding the sentence and guilty plea credit were justified.

  • Sentencing
  • Grievous bodily harm
  • Domestic violence
  • Appeal procedure
  • Driving offences
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Sumit Sharma v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

The appellant has 6 points on his licence from two separate offences, and there is insufficient evidence to show the conviction was wrongly recorded. Allowing him to remain on the Register would undermine public confidence and send the wrong message about the standards expected of Approved Driving Instructors. The appellant is not a fit and proper person to remain on the Register.

  • Removal from register
  • Fit and proper person test
  • Driving offences
  • Approved driving instructors
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.