Galapagos Bidco S.A.R.L v Dr Frank Kebekus & Ors
The releases and restructuring were effective and complied with the ICA. The proceeds of the sale were in cash or substantially in cash, as set-off is equivalent to cash payment. The releases of Primary Creditors’ claims were unconditional and concurrent. Even if strict compliance with clause 17.4(c) were required, the holders of the HYNs were out of the money as at 9 October 2019, so compliance was unnecessary. The Financial Advisers’ Opinion was valid and conclusive for the Enforcement Objective. Signal’s counterclaim failed.
Source excerpt
- Intercreditor agreements
- Financial restructuring
- Release of security
- Subordination of debt
- Declaratory relief