Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court has power under section 42 to enforce peremptory orders of the arbitral tribunal and grants the order sought in paragraph 1 of the draft order, but declines to exercise discretion under section 37 as it is not just and convenient to grant broader relief beyond the scope of the tribunal's peremptory orders.
Source excerpt
The Council failed to demonstrate that it had properly reassessed the balance of factors in light of new information regarding the welfare needs and personal circumstances of residents, including children. Therefore, a final injunction was not granted; instead, the interim injunction was extended to preserve the status quo pending determination of the planning application, with costs in the case.
Source excerpt
Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB) (24 April 2026)
The High Court found that a company director breached fiduciary, statutory and employment duties by diverting clients and confidential information to his own company.
Siniakovich v Hassan-Soudey & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 215 (04 March 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that an action is brought for limitation purposes when the claim form reaches the court office, and struck out a backdating order.
Guy Carpenter & Company Ltd & Ors v Willis Ltd & Ors (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 361 (KB) (20 February 2026)
High Court judgment on alleged team poaching from Guy Carpenter to Willis Re, with findings of duty breaches, inducement and injunctive relief.
Jennifer was the successful party at trial and Adam failed to establish proprietary rights or invalidate the disputed wills. Settlement offers were not sufficiently certain or guaranteed to make Jennifer's refusal unreasonable. Costs are awarded to Jennifer on the standard basis, reduced by 10% for failure on the Sham Tenancies Claim.
Source excerpt
The claimant demonstrated a compelling need for an injunction due to repeated trespass, substantial dangers to trespassers, and ineffectiveness of alternative deterrents; procedural and substantive requirements for a newcomer injunction were satisfied, including territorial and temporal limits, full disclosure, and adequate notice provisions.
Source excerpt
Scott v The Estate of Richard Norman Scott & Ors (Consequential matters) [2025] EWHC 3502 (Ch) (24 November 2025)
The court made consequential costs orders after trial, holding Jennifer was the successful party but reducing her costs by 10% for one failed issue.
The High Court found that publications on Techrights and Tuxmachines defamed Dr Matthew Garrett, caused serious harm, and failed on truth, honest opinion, and public interest defences.
Braunford LLP & Anor v Allain [2025] EWHC 2545 (Ch) (06 October 2025)
The court refused the defendant’s requests for broader disclosure and expert evidence on most trading-strategy issues, but ordered search of all email accounts.
Explore more
