Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Cabo Concepts Ltd v MGA Entertainment (UK) Ltd [2025] EWHC 1451 (Ch) (16 June 2025)
High Court judgment on claims over the Worldeez launch, including alleged dominance abuse, unlawful agreements, patent threats, causation, and damages.
The Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal, holding that the CAT did not err in law in its approach to expert evidence, allocation of common costs, or evaluation of economic value and justification for pricing. The applicant’s grounds were factual or evaluative disputes within the CAT’s discretion and did not amount to errors of law or irrationality.
Source excerpt
Allergan PLC & Ors v Competition and Markets Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 1023 (06 September 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that the CMA’s Chapter I case was properly put to witnesses, overturned the Tribunal’s dishonesty findings, and reinstated the infringement findings.
The CMA's case was properly put to the witnesses and did not require allegations of dishonesty. The Tribunal erred in its procedural approach by issuing provisional findings and requiring further hearings. The Tribunal's findings as to anti-competitive agreements and market definition were supported by the evidence. The companies' appeals from the CMA's Decision are dismissed and the CMA's Decision is reinstated, excluding findings of dishonesty.
Source excerpt
Cerelia Group Holdings SAS & Anor v Competition and Markets Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 352 (11 April 2024)
The Court of Appeal upheld the CMA’s divestiture remedy in the Cérélia/Jus-Rol merger, rejecting challenges to the SLC findings, extension of time, and consultation.
Phones 4U Ltd v EE Ltd & Ors (Expert Evidence) [2021] EWHC 2879 (Ch) (28 October 2021)
The High Court partly allowed Phones 4U’s application to call expert economic evidence, but confined it to specific competition and market issues.
The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Anor (Rev 3) [2020] EWCA Civ 339 (10 March 2020)
Court of Appeal decision on excessive and unfair pricing under Article 102 and the Competition Act 1998, considering how authorities assess evidence and comparators.
The Court of Appeal upheld findings that Network Rail’s RISQS-only rule restricted competition and was an abuse of dominance, dismissing the appeal.
The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1096 (27 June 2019)
The Court of Appeal held that only the General Court’s narrow market-definition finding was binding; other factual findings were not res judicata for the mitigation trial.
The Court of Appeal held that only the necessary basis of the Servier General Court judgment was res judicata, not the wider factual findings Servier sought to rely on.
Explore more
