Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Genel Energy Miran Bina Bawi Ltd v The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq [2026] EWHC 1003 (Comm) (01 May 2026)
The High Court dismissed a s.68 challenge to an LCIA costs award, holding that Article 28.3 displaced the Arbitration Act’s specificity rules for legal costs.
The High Court dismissed a section 68 challenge to an LCIA costs award, holding that Article 28.3 displaced section 63 specificity requirements and that any defect was not an excess of power.
Upper Tribunal appeal on FTT case management in a tax dispute. The UT set aside directions requiring additional locum evidence and postponing HMRC particulars.
The Court of Appeal held that an arbitration clause allowing the Beth Din to amend awards “at any time” was inconsistent with finality, and restored enforcement of the second award.
Bugsby Property LLC & Anor v Omni Bridgeway (Fund 5) Cayman Investments Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 2986 (Comm) (25 November 2024)
The High Court held that clause 19.2 in a litigation funding variation agreement was not an arbitration agreement and dismissed the section 18 application.
The Supreme Court held that English law governed the arbitration agreement and that Kout Food Group had not become a party to the franchise agreement. Enforcement was refused.
Perform Content Services Ltd v Ness Global Services Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 981 (01 July 2021)
The Court of Appeal held that Article 33 of the Brussels Recast Regulation did not apply where English jurisdiction arose under a non-exclusive Article 25 clause.
The High Court held the county court should not have decided rent suspension while an arbitration appeal was pending, because the lease required arbitration of that issue.
The Court of Appeal held that Article 31(2) of Brussels Recast applies to an asymmetric jurisdiction clause, so the English proceedings were not stayed under Article 29.
The Court of Appeal held that challenges under sections 67 and 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 should proceed in court first, and restrained parallel second arbitrations.
Explore more
