Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law

H Amin v Manchester Airport Group Plc & Anor

The EAT dismissed Mr Amin’s appeal, upholding strike-out for non-payment of deposit orders and rejecting challenges to refusal of relief, postponement, and alleged bias.

  • Strike out
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Postponement
  • Bias
  • Costs
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Claudio de Giovanni v Cormac Kehoe & Ors

The court set aside default judgment in a defamation claim, struck out the County Court proceedings as an abuse of process, and set aside the High Court claim form for non-service.

  • Default judgment
  • Abuse of process
  • Jurisdiction
  • Service of process
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Dr Malay Haldar & Anor v Dawn Crook & Ors

The High Court dismissed multiple applications to reinstate struck-out claims, refused interim payments and relief from sanctions, and granted a restrictive injunction.

  • Strike out
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Interim payments
  • Jurisdiction
  • Abuse of process
  • Collateral attack on judgments
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] EWHC 1091 (KB)

Haldar & & Anor v Crook & Ors (Rev1)

Haldar & & Anor v Crook & Ors (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 1091 (KB) (11 May 2026)

The court dismissed applications to restore struck-out claims and for interim payments, held the filings were unintelligible and abusive, and granted a communication injunction.

  • Striking out of claims
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Interim payments
  • Abuse of process
  • Jurisdiction
  • Collateral challenge
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] EWFC 101 (B)

FG v BN (Appeal Out of Time)

FG v BN (Appeal Out of Time) [2026] EWFC 101 (B) (08 May 2026)

Appeal out of time in a financial remedies case dismissed. The court refused relief from sanctions after a 10½-month delay and upheld finality concerns.

  • Financial remedies
  • Appeal out of time
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Non-disclosure of assets
  • Adverse inferences
  • Division of assets
Read case analysis
Family law

FG v BN (Appeal Out of Time)

Appeal out of time in a financial remedies case dismissed for serious delay, incomplete compliance, and no adequate explanation for the final months of default.

  • Financial remedies
  • Appeal out of time
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Non-disclosure of assets
  • Adverse inferences
  • Mental health and litigation delay
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Michael Fred Hanson v Michael Oliver Hanson

The High Court refused the defendant’s renewed application to adjourn a commercial trial, finding the medical evidence inadequate and no sufficient basis to delay trial.

  • Adjournment of trial
  • Medical evidence
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Litigants in person
  • Adjournment-of-trial
  • Medical-evidence
Read case analysis
Arbitration

Tecnicas Reunidas Saudia for Services & Contracting Co Ltd v Petroleum Chemicals and Mining Company Limited

The arbitration agreement in Clause 11.1 of the Purchase Order provided for ad hoc arbitration in London under English law, not ICC arbitration. The Purchase Order, being highest in the order of precedence, prevails over inconsistent terms in the Deviation List and GTCCS. The tribunal had no jurisdiction to conduct ICC arbitration. Relief from sanctions for late acknowledgment of service was refused due to serious breach and lack of good reason.

  • Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal
  • Order of precedence in contract documents
  • Ad hoc vs institutional arbitration
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Waiver and estoppel in arbitration proceedings
Read case analysis
Contract law

Associated Installations Limited v All Asbestos Limited

The default judgment was set aside and the interim third party debt order discharged because, although the Defendant failed to demonstrate a real prospect of defending the claim due to procedural deficiencies and lack of evidence, the seriousness and complexity of the claim, potential counterclaims, and proportionality justified allowing the matter to proceed to trial. Relief from sanctions was granted, with costs awarded against the Defendant.

  • Default judgment
  • Relief from sanctions
  • Third party debt order
  • Fraudulent enforcement
  • Set aside judgment
  • Costs assessment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.