Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court held that consent to assign certain liquidation-related contractual rights could be given without breaching sanctions legislation.
The High Court dismissed the Professional Standards Authority’s appeal against a 12-month suspension imposed on a doctor for boundary-crossing and sexual misconduct with a vulnerable former patient.
The High Court dismissed a sanctions review challenge to the family-association designation criterion and the claimant’s maintained designation under the Russia Regulations.
The High Court dismissed Dr Michael Mew’s appeal against GDC erasure, upheld the PCC’s findings on expert evidence and misconduct, and refused fresh evidence.
Mew v General Dental Council [2026] EWHC 1116 (Admin) (15 May 2026)
High Court appeal in dental discipline dismissed. The court upheld findings that Dr Mew’s orthotropic treatment claims and treatment of two children were not clinically indicated and were misleading.
The High Court dismissed barrister John Stenhouse’s appeal against BSB disciplinary findings for sending emails alleging secret collusion and a cover-up.
Stenhouse v The Bar Standards Board [2026] EWHC 1117 (Admin) (13 May 2026)
High Court appeal from a Bar Standards Board disciplinary decision dismissed. The court upheld findings that a barrister made unfounded allegations and rejected bias, fairness, and sanction challenges.
The Court of Appeal upheld anti-suit injunctions restraining VTB’s Russian proceedings, holding they were vexatious and oppressive attempts to evade English-law arbitration and sanctions.
High Court appeal in a medical fitness-to-practise case. Impairment was upheld, but suspension was quashed and replaced with no further action.
Thampi v General Medical Council [2026] EWHC 1036 (Admin) (01 May 2026)
High Court appeal in GMC fitness-to-practise case. Impairment was upheld, but the three-week suspension was quashed because the Tribunal misapplied the test for taking no action and proportionality.
Explore more
