Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The notices were properly served to the appellant's registered address, the appellant's bare assertion of non-receipt is insufficient to displace the presumption of service, and the penalty is appropriate and fixed by statute.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal dismissed Sally Sims’ appeal, upholding refusal of a second trainee driving instructor licence for non-compliance, altered documentation, and insufficient progress.
The tribunal dismissed Nightingale Care Home Ltd’s challenge to automatic enrolment penalties and remitted the matter to the Pensions Regulator.
The Tribunal allowed a FOIA appeal, finding Potto Parish Council held further information about complaints to its auditor and had breached the 20-working-day response deadline.
The appellant failed to comply with step 3 of the Unpaid Contributions Notice by the deadline, and did not act reasonably in failing to contact the Regulator to explain difficulties. The statutory duty to comply with employer duties is not mitigated by company size or honest mistakes. The Final Penalty Notice was lawfully imposed.
Source excerpt
An election petition challenging the Runcorn and Helsby by-election was dismissed after the court found the count and recount were properly conducted.
The penalty imposed was unreasonable due to procedural shortcomings and mitigating factors; it was reduced to £1,000 to achieve proportionality and uphold consumer protection.
Source excerpt
The scheme of arrangement was sanctioned because all statutory requirements were met, the shareholder class was fairly represented, the scheme was reasonable and advantageous to shareholders, and there was no legal defect or objection.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal struck out one pension penalty appeal for lack of jurisdiction and dismissed the other, holding the notices were validly served and no reasonable excuse was shown.
On the balance of probabilities, the Council had disclosed all relevant information within the scope of the request and did not hold any further information. The Decision Notice did not involve an error of law and was in accordance with the law.
Source excerpt
Explore more
