Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family-law [2026] EWHC 1120 (Fam)

C (Article 13(b): Summary return to Lithuania), Re

C (Article 13(b): Summary return to Lithuania), Re [2026] EWHC 1120 (Fam) (05 May 2026)

The High Court ordered C’s summary return to Lithuania, rejecting the father’s Article 13(b) grave-risk defence based on the mother’s health, alcohol use, and delay.

  • Hague-convention-1980
  • Article-13(b)-grave-risk-exception
  • Summary-return-of-child
  • Protective-measures
  • Habitual-residence
  • Delay-and-settlement
Read case analysis
Family-law

Re C (Art 13(b): Summary Return to Lithuania)

The High Court ordered a child’s summary return to Lithuania, rejecting the father’s Article 13(b) grave-risk defence based on the mother’s past mental health, alcohol use, and delay.

  • Hague-convention-1980
  • Article-13(b)-grave-risk-exception
  • Summary-return
  • Habitual-residence
  • Protective-measures
  • International-child-abduction
Read case analysis
Family-law

X (A Child), Re

Court of Appeal dismissed appeals against a Hague Convention return order for a 14-year-old child, holding the judge had properly weighed the child’s objections and welfare.

  • Child-abduction
  • Hague-convention-1980
  • Child's-objections
  • Article-13(b)-defence
  • Summary-return-of-child
  • Parental-influence
Read case analysis
Family-law [2026] EWCA Civ 518

X (A Child), Re

X (A Child), Re [2026] EWCA Civ 518 (30 April 2026)

Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against the summary return of a 14-year-old child to South Africa under the Hague Convention, rejecting Article 13(b) and welfare-based challenges.

  • Child-abduction
  • Hague-convention-1980
  • Child's-objections
  • Summary-return
  • Parental-influence
  • Article-13(b)-exception
Read case analysis
Family-law

A (A Child) (Habitual Residence), Re

The court held that A was habitually resident in India on 17 October 2025, so it lacked jurisdiction. The wardship and summary return applications were dismissed.

  • Habitual-residence
  • Wardship
  • Jurisdiction-of-english-courts
  • Summary-return-of-child
  • Child-arrangements-jurisdiction
  • Summary-return
Read case analysis
Family-law [2026] EWHC 1140 (Fam)

A (A Child), Re (Habitual Residence)

A (A Child), Re (Habitual Residence) [2026] EWHC 1140 (Fam) (28 April 2026)

The High Court held that A was habitually resident in India on the application date, so it lacked jurisdiction over the wardship and summary return application.

  • Habitual-residence
  • Jurisdiction-of-english-courts
  • Wardship
  • Child-abduction
  • Summary-return
  • Forum-non-conveniens
Read case analysis
Family-law

ZA and BC (Children: Summary Return Order to Dubai), Re

The High Court ordered the return of two children to Dubai after a welfare-based summary return hearing, finding the domestic abuse case unproven and the risk in Dubai low.

  • Child-abduction-(non-hague)
  • Summary-return
  • Welfare-evaluation
  • Domestic-abuse-allegations
  • Protective-measures
  • Geopolitical-risk
Read case analysis
Family-law [2026] EWHC 1230 (Fam)

ZA and BC (Children: Summary Return Order to Dubai), Re

ZA and BC (Children: Summary Return Order to Dubai), Re [2026] EWHC 1230 (Fam) (01 April 2026)

The High Court ordered two children returned to Dubai, finding low risk from alleged domestic abuse and geopolitical concerns, and greater harm in severing their relationship with their father.

  • Child-welfare
  • Summary-return-to-non-convention-state
  • Domestic-abuse-allegations
  • Parental-responsibility
  • Relocation
  • Protective-measures
Read case analysis
Family-law [2026] EWHC 400 (Fam)

X (a Minor), Re (Hague Convention 1980, Article 13(b); Article 13(2))

X (a Minor), Re (Hague Convention 1980, Article 13(b); Article 13(2)) [2026] EWHC 400 (Fam) (24 February 2026)

The High Court ordered X’s summary return to South Africa under the Hague Convention, rejecting Article 13(b) and finding his objections were not authentically his own.

  • Hague-convention-1980
  • Article-13(b)-grave-risk-of-harm
  • Article-13(2)-child's-objections
  • Summary-return-of-child
  • Parental-alienation
  • Enforcement-of-contact-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.