Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

R v Anthony Jesus Sousa

The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for perverting the course of public justice, finding the judge’s interventions in cross-examination were proper and fair.

  • Perverting the course of justice
  • Judicial intervention
  • Fair trial
  • Summing-up
  • Jury directions
  • Perverting-the-course-of-justice
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 340

Mohammed, R. v

Mohammed, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 340 (05 March 2026)

The Court of Appeal upheld Riaz Mohammed’s drug-conspiracy convictions, holding the judge was right to refuse the jury copies of defence speeches and no unfairness arose.

  • Conspiracy to supply controlled drugs
  • Jury directions
  • Fair trial
  • Summing up
  • Appeal against conviction
  • Appeal-against-conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 1599

Toloui, R. v

Toloui, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1599 (20 November 2025)

The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals by Rebecca and Simon Toloui against fraud convictions, holding that the Recorder’s interventions did not deprive them of a fair trial.

  • Fair trial
  • Judicial conduct
  • Fraud by abuse of position
  • Case management
  • Summing up
  • Judicial intervention
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Stephen Hardy

The court held that there was no substance to the disclosure complaint, as extensive disclosure had been made and no targeted request was pursued; the summing-up was fair and balanced given the nature of the evidence; and the sentence, though stern, was justified by the seriousness, multiplicity, and duration of the offending, as well as the applicant's dangerousness. The references to the applicant's occupation as a police officer were legitimate in assessing harm and culpability. None of the grounds of appeal were arguable.

  • Sexual offences
  • Bad character evidence
  • Disclosure
  • Summing-up
  • Sentencing
  • Extended sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v "ALJ"

Consent was not in issue at trial, as the defence was a complete denial and no alternative case on consent was put to the complainant or raised in evidence. The judge was not required to sum up on consent, and the directions given did not render the conviction unsafe.

  • Sexual offences
  • Consent
  • Summing-up
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 441

Butkus, R. v

Butkus, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 441 (01 April 2025)

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against a cocaine-importation conviction, holding that the Recorder’s comments on organised crime did not make the conviction unsafe.

  • Drug importation
  • Judicial comment
  • Summing up
  • Unsafe conviction
  • Jury directions
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 426

White, R. v

White, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 426 (26 March 2025)

The Court of Appeal Criminal Division dismissed Joshua White’s appeal against conviction for sexual assault of a child under 13, finding the summing up and jury response fair.

  • Sexual offences
  • Jury directions
  • Summing up
  • Appeal against conviction
  • Evidence in chief
  • Cross-examination
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] EWCA Crim 1592

Danks, R. v

Danks, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1592 (10 December 2024)

The Court of Appeal refused renewal of leave to appeal against conviction for conspiracy to handle stolen goods, rejecting complaints about interview evidence, directions, conduct, and summing up.

  • Conspiracy to handle stolen goods
  • Adverse inference from silence
  • Judicial directions
  • Fair trial
  • Summation
  • Mixed comment interviews
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Aaron Hewson

The cumulative effect of the Recorder's comments, which were repeatedly adverse to the defence and not sufficiently balanced by reminders of material defence evidence, created an unfairly unbalanced summing-up. This gave rise to a real risk that the jury would perceive the judge as favouring the prosecution, undermining the safety of the convictions. The convictions on all counts (except the count to which the appellant pleaded guilty) were therefore quashed.

  • Sexual offences
  • Summing-up
  • Judicial impartiality
  • Appeal against conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] EWCA Crim 795

Kaur, R. v

Kaur, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 795 (12 July 2024)

The Court of Appeal refused Narinder Kaur’s renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction, rejecting claims of judicial bias, defective summing up, and flawed rulings.

  • Fraud
  • Judicial bias
  • Summing up
  • Jury directions
  • Disclosure
  • Bad character evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.