Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The respondent's conduct did not meet the threshold for a costs award under EAT Rules; the appeal's success alone is not sufficient reason to award costs.
Source excerpt
The EAT dismissed Mr Nowak’s appeal against rejection of race discrimination and victimisation claims, and found no live Working Time Regulations complaint.
The EAT dismissed a barrister’s appeal against rejection of discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims, holding section 47 was correctly applied.
The EAT allowed Mr Matovu’s appeal, holding that the Employment Judge wrongly refused an amendment and RFI request, and that the overall conduct gave rise to apparent bias.
The EAT dismissed an appeal against refusal to extend time for a victimisation claim, holding the tribunal lawfully weighed delay, evidential prejudice and reputational risk.
The Privy Council dismissed a constitutional appeal, holding that a 17-year delay in bringing the claim was inordinate and lacked a cogent explanation.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal refused appeals against a costs order and reconsideration decision after finding the claimant knowingly gave untrue information about his employment status.
County Court judgment on alleged race and religion discrimination and victimisation in Conservative Party candidate approval and disciplinary proceedings.
Arif v Baker & Ors [2026] EWCC 14 (02 April 2026)
County Court Equality Act claim arising from a Conservative Party dispute over approval, selection, discipline, and re-expulsion. The court addressed discrimination, victimisation, and limitation.
The EAT allowed an appeal in a victimisation case, holding that the tribunal failed to answer the remitted causation question and remitted the matter again.
Explore more
