POTHA IN TUNCHANOK v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD
上訴人就拒絕批予司法覆核許可提出上訴,但未能指出原審法官的任何錯誤;上訴法庭認為其理由僅屬一般性指稱,遂駁回上訴。
- Non-refoulement
- Leave to apply for judicial review
- Appeal from refusal of leave
- Irrationality
- Procedural unfairness
- Judicial-review
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Source-linked decisions currently available to browse
上訴人就拒絕批予司法覆核許可提出上訴,但未能指出原審法官的任何錯誤;上訴法庭認為其理由僅屬一般性指稱,遂駁回上訴。
The Court of Appeal dismissed a non-refoulement appeal challenging refusal of leave for judicial review, finding only general and unparticularised allegations.
The Court of Appeal dismissed this non-refoulement appeal, finding no viable ground to interfere with the refusal of leave to seek judicial review.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Daljit Singh’s appeal against refusal of leave for judicial review in a non-refoulement claim, finding no viable ground to interfere.
上訴人不服拒絕批予司法覆核許可的命令提出上訴,但未提出可行理由;上訴法院認為原審無錯,遂駁回上訴。
The Court of Appeal dismissed an applicant’s appeal against refusal of leave to seek judicial review in a non-refoulement claim, finding no arguable error and no basis to intervene.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Azhar Abbas’s appeal against refusal of leave for judicial review in a non-refoulement claim, finding no evidential basis or legal error.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Sana Ullah’s appeal from refusal of leave to seek judicial review of a non-refoulement decision, finding only bare assertions with no particulars.
Appeal dismissed on paper where the applicant advanced no specific ground against refusal of leave to seek judicial review in a non-refoulement case.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal of leave to seek judicial review of non-refoulement claim decisions, including claims by two minor applicants.
Explore more