Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law

ZJ v HS

The Court of Appeal granted direct leave, allowed the mother’s appeal, set aside the refusal of an injunction, and made interim child-protection orders with no order as to costs.

  • Domestic and cohabitation relationship violence ordinance
  • Interim care and control of children
  • Supervised contact
  • Costs
  • Child-welfare
  • Injunctions
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] HKFC 20

黃 對 張

Maintaining the children's existing stable arrangement in Hong Kong best serves their welfare: joint custody is appropriate; father is the more suitable person for day-to-day care and control because he is the established primary carer, provides stability for schooling and daily needs, and there is no proven risk of harm; mother is granted reasonable contact; travel to Mainland for visits is permitted given historical practice and absence of objection from father.

  • Joint custody
  • Care and control
  • Contact/visitation
  • Best interests of the child
  • Social welfare report
  • Inter-jurisdictional travel
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] HKCFI 770

HSC AND ANOTHER v. D

The Court of First Instance granted parental orders for two children born through illegal surrogacy arrangements, approved specified payments, and extended the six-month filing period.

  • Parental order
  • Commercial surrogacy illegality
  • Approval of payments under s.12(7)
  • Extension of s.12(2) time limit
  • Service out of jurisdiction (mainland china)
  • Status of parentage under prc law
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2026] HKCA 40

WD代表LNT (未成年人) 對 醫院管理局行政總裁及另一人

With a signed consent to withdraw by the applicant and proposed third respondent/appellant and no opposition from respondents (neutral stance), the Court allowed withdrawal and struck out the appeal CACV 537/2025 and the joinder summons filed 23 July 2025; the Court exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs in respect of the appeal, the summons and the 24 July 2025 affidavit; parties' names were anonymized because the case involves a minor.

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Joinder/permission to join
  • Costs
  • Anonymity of minors
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] HKCA 18

NPYJ v. SMRC

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal, dismissed new evidence and stay applications, and upheld paper determination of expert issues in a child custody dispute.

  • Leave to appeal
  • Parental alienation
  • Expert evidence and cross-examination
  • Admission of fresh evidence (ladd v marshall; o 59 r 10(2))
  • Child custody and care and control
  • Case management
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] HKFC 6

LL v. GR

The mother’s application for a non-molestation order and ouster order was dismissed because the alleged incidents did not meet the statutory threshold for molestation.

  • Non-molestation order
  • Ouster order
  • Child access and contact
  • Expert assessment and treatment
  • Non-molestation-order
  • Ouster-order
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] HKFC 203

H v. W

The court allowed limited child removals for overseas school trips and holiday travel, subject to detailed notice, proof, and safeguarding conditions.

  • Child removal
  • Parental responsibility
  • Non-removal order
  • Travel arrangements
  • Best interests of the child
  • Child-removal
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] HKFC 190

CYMY v. YKKE

The Family Court dismissed the respondent’s application for leave to appeal and stay of execution, holding there was no reasonable prospect of success.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Leave to appeal
  • Enforcement of orders in prc
  • Stay of execution
  • Costs assessment
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] HKFC 183

L W S v. T M L T

A District Court child-maintenance judgment partly allowed the mother’s claims, rejected much of the Autism Circle evidence, and awarded reduced lump sum, periodic maintenance, and carer’s allowance.

  • Carer\u2019s allowance
  • Lump sum maintenance
  • Periodical payments
  • Therapy expenses (aba)
  • Evidence and proof of payments
  • Best interests of the child
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] HKCFI 4249

DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE v. FC AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance rebutted the presumption of paternity, dispensed with the mother’s consent, and freed an infant for adoption.

  • Dispensation of consent
  • Rebuttal of presumption of paternity
  • Best interests of the child
  • Sibling placement and joint adoption
  • Adoption
  • Child-welfare
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.