Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Admiralty law [2024] HKCFI 2722

TASMANIA FEEDLOT PTY. LTD AND OTHERS v. TOLL GLOBAL FORWARDING (HONG KONG) LTD

The Court of First Instance refused a Third Party amendment to add a preliminary issue on a sea waybill package limitation clause, but allowed deletions from the summons.

  • Package limitation clause
  • Interpretation of sea waybill
  • Strike out and summary disposal under order 14a
  • Amendment of pleadings/summons
  • Civil-procedure
  • Contract-interpretation
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2021] HKCA 630

HKSAR v. TAI YIU TING AND OTHERS

The Court of Appeal refused leave and dismissed all appeals in the Occupy Central public nuisance case, upholding convictions and the sentences for D1 and D8.

  • Public nuisance
  • Conspiracy
  • Incitement
  • Freedom of assembly
  • Joint enterprise
  • Legal certainty
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2020] HKCFI 927

香港特別行政區 訴 李雪暉

The trial judge accepted the attendant's testimony and CCTV evidence which corroborated intentional pushing by the appellant; those credibility findings were not irrational or impossible and therefore the prosecution proved all elements of common assault beyond reasonable doubt, so the conviction stands.

  • Common assault
  • Self-defence
  • Unlawful detention
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Cctv evidence
  • Appeal on facts
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] HKCFA 37

HKSAR v. MAK WAN LING (麥允齡)

The Court held that gross negligence in the offence of manslaughter by gross negligence is proved by application of an objective standard of reasonableness as enunciated in R v Adomako; there is no additional requirement that the prosecution prove the defendant's subjective awareness of an obvious and serious risk of death, although evidence of such awareness is relevant to liability.

  • Gross negligence manslaughter
  • Mens rea vs objective standard
  • Jury direction and evaluation
  • Statutory interpretation distinction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] HKCFI 727

RE CLARE MONTGOMERY QC

Application under s 27 of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance to admit Clare Montgomery QC to appear in a criminal appeal was refused.

  • Gross negligence manslaughter
  • Admission of foreign counsel
  • Fault element (objective v subjective)
  • Question of law reserved
  • Role of expert evidence
  • Admission-of-overseas-counsel
Read case analysis
Constitutional law TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS

TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, holding the issues on judicial immunity and Basic Law Article 85 were not of great general or public importance.

  • Judicial immunity
  • Interpretation of basic law article 85
  • Leave to appeal under s22(1)(b) court of final appeal ordinance cap.484
  • Costs summary assessment
  • Judicial-immunity
  • Basic-law-article-85
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. MUI KWOK KEUNG

HKSAR v. MUI KWOK KEUNG

The Court of Appeal upheld convictions of a barrister for champerty, holding that fee-sharing arrangements with lay clients were criminal and that no exception applied.

  • Champerty
  • Maintenance
  • Contingency fees
  • Access to justice
  • Sentencing
  • Legal practitioners ordinance
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. CHAN YAU HEI

HKSAR v. CHAN YAU HEI

The Court of First Instance refused to certify a question to the Court of Final Appeal about whether the internet is a “public place” for outraging public decency.

  • Outraging public decency
  • Definition of public place
  • Internet as public place
  • Freedom of speech
  • Certification to court of final appeal
  • Outraging-public-decency
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. LAU SI SING

HKSAR v. LAU SI SING

The Court of Appeal allowed the sentence appeal in part, reducing the conspiracy-to-pervert sentence and fixing part of it consecutively, for a total of 4 years 3 months.

  • Bribery
  • Conspiracy to pervert the course of public justice
  • Sentencing
  • Restitution order
  • Breach of trust
  • Conspiracy-to-pervert-the-course-of-justice
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. TSUI KING SING

HKSAR v. TSUI KING SING

High Court appeal on perverting the course of justice. The court allowed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence that the appellant’s offer had the necessary tendency.

  • Perverting the course of public justice
  • Attempt to pervert the course of justice
  • Appeal against conviction
  • Tendency test
  • Perverting-the-course-of-justice
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.