Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2026] HKCFI 202

DELCO PARTICIPATION B.V. v. CHIHO ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP LTD (formerly known as CHIHO-TIANDE GROUP LTD) AND OTHERS

The Court of First Instance continued and expanded post-judgment Mareva relief, holding that in exceptional cases freezing orders may cover assets held on trust or as nominee for third parties.

  • Mareva freezing injunction
  • Ancillary asset disclosure
  • Assets held on trust/nominee
  • Chabra jurisdiction
  • Solodchenko construction
  • Mareva-injunction
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2025] HKCFI 6475

GERMAN POOL GROUP CO LTD AND OTHERS v. DYSON TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER

The court partly allowed a discovery summons in an inquiry as to damages, refusing some requests as irrelevant and allowing narrower discovery on two issues.

  • Interim injunction
  • Cross-undertaking in damages
  • Groundless threats (s89 patents ordinance)
  • Exemplary/aggravated damages
  • Relevance and scope of discovery
  • Privilege and disclosure obligations
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKCFI 6197

LAM SIU SUN DENNIS AND ANOTHER v. TAM MAN CHUN AND ANOTHER

The court dismissed a committal application over specific discovery, holding the underlying order lacked a penal notice when leave was sought and the alleged breach was trivial.

  • Committal
  • Penal notice requirement
  • Service of order
  • Specific discovery
  • Leave to apply for committal
  • Oppression in civil enforcement
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKCFI 5847

JIU RONG HOLDINGS LTD v. SIU CHI MING

The Court granted an unless order requiring further asset disclosure under a Mareva injunction, with strike-out of the defence if the defendant does not comply.

  • Unless order
  • Ancillary disclosure
  • Striking out for non-compliance
  • Non-party disclosure
  • Unless-order
  • Mareva-injunction
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2023] HKCFI 3208

CHINACHEM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LTD v. WILKINSON & GRIST (a firm)

The High Court dismissed Chinachem Charitable Foundation’s appeal against a discovery ruling in taxation proceedings, requiring it to identify specific fee-note entries first.

  • Taxation of costs
  • Discovery of documents
  • Case management and proportionality
  • Relevance and fishing expeditions
  • Taxation-of-costs
  • Discovery-of-documents
Read case analysis
Competition law [2023] HKCT 9

COMPETITION COMMISSION v. ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LTD AND OTHERS

The Competition Tribunal gave case management directions on penalty sequencing, consolidation, confidentiality wording, and disclosure of cooperation agreements.

  • Kam kwong application
  • Consolidation of proceedings
  • Pecuniary penalties
  • Confidentiality orders
  • Cooperation/leniency agreements
  • Sequencing of liability and penalty
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] HKCFI 3012

A v. R1 AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance granted a Norwich Pharmacal order against two banks to disclose bank documents relating to a judgment debtor’s Hong Kong accounts.

  • Norwich pharmacal
  • Third party disclosure
  • Post-judgment discovery
  • Asset tracing
  • Enforcement of foreign money judgment
  • Jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] HKCFI 2642

CHAN KUI HAI, THE SOLE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHAN SHING CHEUNG, DECEASED v. CHAN KUI KEUNG AND OTHERS

The court granted leave to file a second supplemental list of documents, holding that updated estate accounts and bank statements were relevant to alleged misappropriation and executor accounting issues.

  • Discovery
  • Estate accounts
  • Executor duties
  • Misappropriation
  • Wrongful occupation
  • Mesne profits
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] HKCFI 969

DAC CHINA SOS (BARBADOS) SRL v. PACIFIC HARBOUR ADVISORS PTE LTD AND ANOTHER

The court held PHA in contempt for breaching a disclosure order, but not Mr Allderige personally. It also found the receiver in contempt for breaching undertakings to notify DAC.

  • Breach of undertaking
  • Breach of disclosure order
  • Personal liability of director for corporate contempt
  • Duties of court-appointed receiver
  • Committal/sanctions
  • Leave to cross-examine in contempt proceedings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.