ć˝ ĺ° ĺźľ
Court granted permission because applicant gave a credible and contemporaneous explanation for not applying at divorce (trust in husband and reliance on his continued support), the delay was reasonably explained and not inordinate, respondent failed to show substantive prejudice from reopening (his remarriage and new child did not amount to sufficient unjust prejudice), and applicant demonstrated a real prospect of obtaining ancillary relief given length of marriage and the flat acquired during marriage.
Source excerpt
- Ancillary relief
- Permission to apply
- Property division
- Child maintenance
- Delay/prejudice