Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court found a prescriptive right of way and an easement of necessity over the disputed path, granted injunctions, and awarded HK$592,200 in damages.
District Court granted an interlocutory prohibitory injunction protecting a claimed right of way, holding damages were inadequate and a serious issue existed.
The Court of Final Appeal held that a co-owner could be bound by a right of way arising from proprietary estoppel where it did not exceed the grantor’s proper use or prejudice the other co-owner.
The Lands Tribunal held that Pakatower had exclusive occupation rights in the disputed premises, ordered vacant possession and mesne profits, and dismissed the Incorporated Owners’ counterclaims.
The Lands Tribunal held the disputed premises remained part of Pakatower’s unit, not common areas or facilities, and ordered vacant possession and mesne profits.
The court rejected a claimed public right of way and prescription-based easement over Pak Lok Path, and upheld the defendant’s counterclaim for declaratory relief and an injunction.
The District Court held that part of House No.35A lay within Lot 426, granting the plaintiff possessory title to PA1 and a prescriptive right of way over PA2.
The Court of First Instance granted declarations of a pedestrian and vehicular right of way over the Suit Access Road, mainly on lost modern grant.
The Court of Appeal held that the plaintiffs had vehicular and pedestrian easements over the Side Gate, but no vehicular right over the Main Gate. Nominal damages were awarded for interference in 2013.
The Court of Appeal held that the 1958 land grant gave the lessee a general right of way that included vehicular access, and dismissed the appeal.
Explore more
