THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF PAK TAT MANSION v. TANG KEE TONG trading as CHILI KING
The Lands Tribunal held that the respondent’s occupation of a common area was not adverse possession, rejected equity-based defences, and ordered vacant possession and mesne profits.
- Adverse possession
- Proprietary estoppel
- Acquiescence
- Laches
- Trespass/mesne profits
- Vacant possession