LI PING CHUN AND ANOTHER v. LIANG TONGHUA
法院認為原告人就涉案物業的可爭辯權利及被指具欺詐債權意圖的轉讓足以支持持續禁制令,並只對梁通華以外的受讓人限制處置物業。
- Mareva injunction
- Chabra jurisdiction
- Charging order
- Section 60 cpo (fraudulent conveyance)
- Asset disclosure order
- Post-judgment enforcement
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
法院認為原告人就涉案物業的可爭辯權利及被指具欺詐債權意圖的轉讓足以支持持續禁制令,並只對梁通華以外的受讓人限制處置物業。
The court expunged an affirmation that contained argument and hearsay, and held that a disputed claim under section 60 required proceedings to continue by writ, with costs against the plaintiff.
Explore more